Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA.
Br J Cancer. 2013 Feb 19;108(3):512-8. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2013.15. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
The polyamine-inhibitory regimen difluoromethylornithine (DFMO)+sulindac has marked efficacy in preventing metachronous colorectal adenomas. Polyamines are synthesised endogenously and obtained from dietary sources. Here we investigate dietary polyamine intake and outcomes in the DFMO+sulindac colorectal adenoma prevention trial.
Dietary polyamine data were available for 188 of 267 patients completing the study. Total dietary polyamine content was derived by the sum of dietary putrescine, spermine and spermidine values and categorised into two groups: highest (>75-100%) vs the lower three quartiles (0-25, 25-50 and 50-75%). Baseline tissue polyamine concentration and ODC1 genotype were determined. Logistic regression models were used for risk estimation.
A significant interaction was detected between dietary polyamine group and treatment with regard to adenoma recurrence (P=0.012). Significant metachronous adenoma risk reduction was observed after DFMO+sulindac treatment in dietary polyamine quartiles 1-3 (risk ratio (RR) 0.19; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-0.42; P<0.0001) but not in quartile 4 (RR 1.51; 95% CI 0.53-4.29; P=0.44). However, a lower number of events in the placebo group within dietary quartile 4 confound the aforementioned risk estimates.
These preliminary findings reveal complex relationships between diet and therapeutic prevention, and they support further clinical trial-based investigations where the dietary intervention itself is controlled.
多胺抑制方案DFMO(DFMO)+舒林酸在预防结直肠腺瘤的异时性方面具有显著疗效。多胺在体内合成,并从饮食中获得。在此,我们研究了 DFMO+舒林酸结直肠腺瘤预防试验中的饮食多胺摄入量和结果。
完成研究的 267 例患者中有 188 例可获得饮食多胺数据。通过饮食腐胺、精胺和亚精胺值的总和得出总饮食多胺含量,并将其分为两组:最高(>75-100%)与较低的三个四分位数(0-25、25-50 和 50-75%)。确定基线组织多胺浓度和 ODC1 基因型。使用逻辑回归模型进行风险估计。
饮食多胺组与治疗之间存在显著的相互作用,与腺瘤复发有关(P=0.012)。在 DFMO+舒林酸治疗中,在饮食多胺四分位 1-3 中观察到显著的异时性腺瘤风险降低(风险比(RR)0.19;95%置信区间(CI)0.08-0.42;P<0.0001),但在四分位 4 中没有(RR 1.51;95% CI 0.53-4.29;P=0.44)。然而,在饮食四分位 4 中安慰剂组的事件数量较少,使上述风险估计产生偏差。
这些初步发现揭示了饮食和治疗预防之间的复杂关系,并支持进一步进行基于临床试验的研究,其中饮食干预本身受到控制。