Sun P, Ji B, Sun Y, Zhu X, Liu J, Long C, Zheng Z
Department of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, State Key Laboratory of Cardiovascular Disease, Fuwai Hospital, National Center for Cardiovascular Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100037, People's Republic of China.
Perfusion. 2013 May;28(3):238-43. doi: 10.1177/0267659112474861. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
Reducing the priming volume is an effective means of decreasing hemodilution and blood transfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). The patient's own blood was used to replace the crystalloid in the CPB circuit by retrograde autologous priming (RAP) in order to decrease the priming volume. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to investigate whether RAP could reduce blood transfusion and improve clinical outcomes.
A comprehensive search was conducted for randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) exploring RAP in PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, Google Scholar and Chinese literature databases (WanFang, WeiPu and CNKI). Clinical parameters and outcomes were focused on the lowest hematocrit (Hct) during CPB, the number of patients transfused blood intraoperatively, the number of patients transfused blood perioperatively, the number of blood units transfused, 24-hour chest tube drainage, hours to extubation, length of ICU stay, and length of hospital stay.
Ten trials, with a total of 1123 patients, were included. The number of patients transfused blood intraoperatively (RR = 0.39, 95% CI = [0.29, 0.53], p<0.00001, I(2) = 40%) and perioperatively (RR = 0.53, 95% CI = [0.43, 0.66], p<0.00001, I(2) = 0%) and the number of blood units transfused (SMD = -0.53, 95% CI = [-0.73, -0.33], p<0.00001, I(2) = 14%) were all significantly reduced in the RAP group. No differences in the hours to extubation (SMD = -0.11, 95% CI = [-0.33, 0.12], p=0.37, I(2) = 0%) and the length of ICU stay (SMD = -0.17, 95% CI = [-0.41, 0.08], p=0.18, I(2) = 0%) were observed between the two groups.
Compared to conventional priming, RAP could reduce transfusion in adults significantly, but had no effect on clinical outcomes, comparing to conventional priming. Further studies involving RAP are expected to investigate if this technique is beneficial to the patient.
减少预充量是减少体外循环(CPB)期间血液稀释和输血的有效手段。通过逆行自体预充(RAP)使用患者自身血液替代CPB回路中的晶体液,以减少预充量。因此,我们进行了一项荟萃分析,以研究RAP是否能减少输血并改善临床结局。
在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、谷歌学术和中文文献数据库(万方、维普和知网)中全面检索探索RAP的随机对照试验(RCT)。临床参数和结局重点关注CPB期间的最低血细胞比容(Hct)、术中输血患者数量、围手术期输血患者数量、输血量、24小时胸腔引流管引流量、拔管时间、ICU住院时间和住院时间。
纳入10项试验,共1123例患者。RAP组术中输血患者数量(RR = 0.39,95%CI = [0.29, 0.53],p<0.00001,I(2)=40%)、围手术期输血患者数量(RR = 0.53,95%CI = [0.43, 0.66],p<0.00001,I(2)=0%)和输血量(SMD = -0.53,95%CI = [-0.73, -0.33],p<0.00001,I(2)=14%)均显著减少。两组在拔管时间(SMD = -0.11,95%CI = [-0.33, 0.12],p = 0.37,I(2)=0%)和ICU住院时间(SMD = -0.17,95%CI = [-0.41, 0.08],p = 0.18,I(2)=0%)方面未观察到差异。
与传统预充相比,RAP可显著减少成人输血,但与传统预充相比,对临床结局无影响。预计进一步涉及RAP的研究将调查该技术是否对患者有益。