Ophir R, Jackman A, Relyveld E H, Ben-Efraim S
Department of Human Microbiology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
Anticancer Res. 1990 Jan-Feb;10(1):231-5.
Immunization with viable tumor cells followed by subsequent administration of glutaraldehyde-treated tumor cells induced a protective antitumor immune response in the host toward the alkylating-drug resistant RPC-5 plasmacytoma. This was proven by resistance to challenge with RPC-5 tumor cells, neutralization in Winn tests, by effectiveness of combined chemotherapy with melphalan plus immunotherapy with spleen cells from RPC-5 immunized mice and in vitro by cytotoxicity tests. The specificity of the immune response was ascertained in vivo by comparison with the response toward MOPC-315 plasmacytoma. However, in vitro cytotoxicity tests revealed the occurrence of shared antigens between the RPC-5 and MOPC-315 tumor cells. It is concluded that the ineffectiveness of alkylating-drug treatment toward the RPC-5 tumor is not due to the inability of this tumor to induce a specific antitumor immune response, and that cross-antigenic relationship as revealed by in vitro cytotoxicity tests does not necessarily reflect cross-protection between various plasmacytomas.
用活肿瘤细胞免疫,随后给予经戊二醛处理的肿瘤细胞,可诱导宿主对烷化剂耐药的RPC-5浆细胞瘤产生保护性抗肿瘤免疫反应。这通过对RPC-5肿瘤细胞攻击的抗性、Winn试验中的中和作用、美法仑联合化疗与来自RPC-5免疫小鼠的脾细胞免疫治疗的有效性以及体外细胞毒性试验得到证实。通过与对MOPC-315浆细胞瘤的反应进行比较,在体内确定了免疫反应的特异性。然而,体外细胞毒性试验显示RPC-5和MOPC-315肿瘤细胞之间存在共同抗原。得出的结论是,烷化剂治疗对RPC-5肿瘤无效并非由于该肿瘤无法诱导特异性抗肿瘤免疫反应,并且体外细胞毒性试验所揭示的交叉抗原关系不一定反映各种浆细胞瘤之间的交叉保护作用。