Hofstra North Shore-LIJ School of Medicine, Great Neck, NY 11021, USA.
N Engl J Med. 2013 Jan 24;368(4):307-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1203165.
Peginesatide, a synthetic peptide-based erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA), is a potential therapy for anemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease.
We conducted two randomized, controlled, open-label studies (EMERALD 1 and EMERALD 2) involving patients undergoing hemodialysis. Cardiovascular safety was evaluated by analysis of an adjudicated composite safety end point--death from any cause, stroke, myocardial infarction, or serious adverse events of congestive heart failure, unstable angina, or arrhythmia--with the use of pooled data from the two EMERALD studies and two studies involving patients not undergoing dialysis. In the EMERALD studies, 1608 patients received peginesatide once monthly or continued to receive epoetin one to three times a week, with the doses adjusted as necessary to maintain a hemoglobin level between 10.0 and 12.0 g per deciliter for 52 weeks or more. The primary efficacy end point was the mean change from the baseline hemoglobin level to the mean level during the evaluation period; noninferiority was established if the lower limit of the two-sided 95% confidence interval was -1.0 g per deciliter or higher in the comparison of peginesatide with epoetin. The aim of evaluating the composite safety end point in the pooled cohort was to exclude a hazard ratio with peginesatide relative to the comparator ESA of more than 1.3.
In an analysis involving 693 patients from EMERALD 1 and 725 from EMERALD 2, peginesatide was noninferior to epoetin in maintaining hemoglobin levels (mean between-group difference, -0.15 g per deciliter; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.30 to -0.01 in EMERALD 1; and 0.10 g per deciliter; 95% CI, -0.05 to 0.26 in EMERALD 2). The hazard ratio for the composite safety end point was 1.06 (95% CI, 0.89 to 1.26) with peginesatide relative to the comparator ESA in the four pooled studies (2591 patients) and 0.95 (95% CI, 0.77 to 1.17) in the EMERALD studies. The proportions of patients with adverse and serious adverse events were similar in the treatment groups in the EMERALD studies. The cardiovascular safety of peginesatide was similar to that of the comparator ESA in the pooled cohort.
Peginesatide, administered monthly, was as effective as epoetin, administered one to three times per week, in maintaining hemoglobin levels in patients undergoing hemodialysis. (Funded by Affymax and Takeda Pharmaceutical; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT00597753 [EMERALD 1], NCT00597584 [EMERALD 2], NCT00598273 [PEARL 1], and NCT00598442 [PEARL 2].).
培利塞肽是一种合成肽类促红细胞生成素刺激剂(ESA),有可能成为治疗晚期慢性肾脏病患者贫血的一种疗法。
我们进行了两项随机、对照、开放性研究(EMERALD 1 和 EMERALD 2),纳入了正在接受血液透析的患者。通过分析一个经裁定的复合安全性终点——任何原因导致的死亡、中风、心肌梗死,或充血性心力衰竭、不稳定型心绞痛或心律失常的严重不良事件——来评估心血管安全性,该终点采用了来自两项 EMERALD 研究和两项不接受透析治疗患者的研究的汇总数据。在 EMERALD 研究中,1608 名患者每月接受培利塞肽治疗或继续每周接受 1 至 3 次促红细胞生成素治疗,必要时调整剂量,以维持血红蛋白水平在每分升 10.0 至 12.0 克之间 52 周或更长时间。主要疗效终点为从基线血红蛋白水平到评估期间平均水平的变化;如果在培利塞肽与促红细胞生成素的比较中,双侧 95%置信区间的下限为 -1.0 克/分升或更高,则认为培利塞肽具有非劣效性。在汇总队列中评估复合安全性终点的目的是排除培利塞肽相对于比较 ESA 的风险比大于 1.3。
在涉及 EMERALD 1 的 693 名患者和 EMERALD 2 的 725 名患者的分析中,培利塞肽在维持血红蛋白水平方面不劣于促红细胞生成素(组间平均差异,-0.15 克/分升;EMERALD 1 为 -0.30 至 -0.01;EMERALD 2 为 0.10 克/分升;95%置信区间为 -0.05 至 0.26)。在四项汇总研究(2591 名患者)中,培利塞肽相对于比较 ESA 的复合安全性终点的风险比为 1.06(95%置信区间为 0.89 至 1.26),在 EMERALD 研究中为 0.95(95%置信区间为 0.77 至 1.17)。治疗组中不良事件和严重不良事件的患者比例在 EMERALD 研究中相似。培利塞肽的心血管安全性与汇总队列中的比较 ESA 相似。
每月给予培利塞肽与每周给予 1 至 3 次促红细胞生成素治疗在维持血液透析患者的血红蛋白水平方面同样有效。(由 Affymax 和武田制药公司资助;临床试验.gov 编号,NCT00597753[EMERALD 1]、NCT00597584[EMERALD 2]、NCT00598273[PEARL 1]和 NCT00598442[PEARL 2])。)