• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替米沙坦与缬沙坦降压治疗的随机试验荟萃分析。

A meta-analysis of randomized trials of telmisartan vs. valsartan therapy for blood pressure reduction.

机构信息

Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Shizuoka Medical Center, Shizuoka, Japan.

出版信息

Hypertens Res. 2013 Jul;36(7):627-33. doi: 10.1038/hr.2012.233. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1038/hr.2012.233
PMID:23344134
Abstract

A previous meta-analysis of six randomized head-to-head trials suggests that the blood pressure (BP)-lowering capabilities of telmisartan may be comparable to those of valsartan. We performed an updated meta-analysis of telmisartan vs. valsartan therapy for the reduction of BP in hypertensive patients. MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched through August 2012 using web-based search engines (PubMed, OVID). Eligible studies were prospective randomized controlled trials examining telmisartan vs. valsartan therapy and reporting clinic BP as an outcome. For each study, the data regarding changes from baseline to final clinic systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP) in both the telmisartan and valsartan groups were used to generate mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Of the 62 potentially relevant articles initially screened, 17 reports about prospective randomized controlled clinical trials of telmisartan vs. valsartan therapy, including a total of 5422 patients with hypertension, were identified and included. Pooled analysis suggested significant differences in BP reductions among the patients randomized to telmisartan vs. valsartan therapy (MD for SBP, -2.04 mm Hg; 95% CI, -2.80 to -1.28 mm Hg; P<0.00001; MD for DBP, -1.08 mm Hg; 95% CI, -1.55 to -0.62 mm Hg; P<0.00001). When data from the monotherapy and combination therapy (with hydrochlorothiazide) trials were pooled separately, telmisartan therapy was associated with a statistically significant difference in BP reductions relative to valsartan therapy in both the monotherapy and combination therapy groups. In conclusion, telmisartan therapy appears to reduce BP more than valsartan therapy in patients with hypertension.

摘要

一项先前的荟萃分析包括六项随机头对头试验,结果表明替米沙坦的降压能力可能与缬沙坦相当。我们对替米沙坦与缬沙坦治疗高血压患者血压降低的疗效进行了更新的荟萃分析。通过网络搜索引擎(PubMed、OVID)检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库,检索时间截至 2012 年 8 月。合格的研究是前瞻性随机对照试验,研究对象为替米沙坦与缬沙坦治疗,并报告诊室血压作为结果。对于每项研究,我们使用基线至最终诊室收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)的变化数据,生成替米沙坦和缬沙坦组的均值差值(MD)和 95%置信区间(CI)。在最初筛选的 62 篇潜在相关文章中,确定了 17 篇关于替米沙坦与缬沙坦治疗的前瞻性随机对照临床试验报告,共纳入 5422 例高血压患者。汇总分析表明,随机分配至替米沙坦组与缬沙坦组的患者在血压降低方面存在显著差异(SBP 的 MD,-2.04mmHg;95%CI,-2.80 至-1.28mmHg;P<0.00001;DBP 的 MD,-1.08mmHg;95%CI,-1.55 至-0.62mmHg;P<0.00001)。当分别汇总单药治疗和联合治疗(与氢氯噻嗪合用)试验的数据时,替米沙坦治疗与缬沙坦治疗相比,在单药和联合治疗组中均与血压降低有统计学显著差异。总之,替米沙坦治疗似乎比缬沙坦治疗更能降低高血压患者的血压。

相似文献

1
A meta-analysis of randomized trials of telmisartan vs. valsartan therapy for blood pressure reduction.替米沙坦与缬沙坦降压治疗的随机试验荟萃分析。
Hypertens Res. 2013 Jul;36(7):627-33. doi: 10.1038/hr.2012.233. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
2
Comparative effects of telmisartan and valsartan as add-on agents for hypertensive patients with morning blood pressure insufficiently controlled by amlodipine monotherapy.比较替米沙坦和缬沙坦作为氨氯地平单药治疗晨峰血压控制不佳的高血压患者的附加治疗药物的效果。
Hypertens Res. 2014 Mar;37(3):225-31. doi: 10.1038/hr.2013.141. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
3
A meta-analysis of randomized trials of telmisartan versus losartan for reduction of ambulatory blood pressure.替米沙坦与氯沙坦降压治疗的随机临床试验的荟萃分析:动态血压监测
Hypertens Res. 2013 Nov;36(11):959-66. doi: 10.1038/hr.2013.78. Epub 2013 Aug 15.
4
Effects of telmisartan therapy on interleukin-6 and tumor necrosis factor-alpha levels: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.替米沙坦治疗对白细胞介素-6 和肿瘤坏死因子-α水平的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Hypertens Res. 2013 Apr;36(4):368-73. doi: 10.1038/hr.2012.196. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
5
Comparison of fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide 40/12.5 mg and 80/12.5 mg and a fixed-dose combination of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide 50/12.5 mg in mild to moderate essential hypertension: pooled analysis of two multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point (PROBE) trials.替米沙坦/氢氯噻嗪40/12.5毫克和80/12.5毫克固定剂量组合与氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪50/12.5毫克固定剂量组合治疗轻度至中度原发性高血压的比较:两项多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲终点(PROBE)试验的汇总分析
Clin Ther. 2005 Nov;27(11):1795-805. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.11.014.
6
Effects of the angiotensin II receptor blockers telmisartan versus valsartan in combination with hydrochlorothiazide: a large, confirmatory trial.血管紧张素II受体阻滞剂替米沙坦与缬沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪的疗效比较:一项大型验证性试验。
Blood Press Monit. 2008 Feb;13(1):21-7. doi: 10.1097/MBP.0b013e3282f3859d.
7
Telmisartan 80 mg/hydrochlorothiazide 25 mg provides clinically relevant blood pressure reductions across baseline blood pressures.替米沙坦 80 毫克/氢氯噻嗪 25 毫克在整个基础血压范围内提供具有临床相关性的血压降低。
Adv Ther. 2012 Apr;29(4):327-38. doi: 10.1007/s12325-012-0013-0. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
8
A systematic review and meta-analysis of telmisartan versus valsartan in the management of essential hypertension.替米沙坦与缬沙坦治疗原发性高血压的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2010 Jun;12(6):414-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2010.00287.x.
9
A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of azilsartan therapy for blood pressure reduction.一项关于阿齐沙坦降压治疗的随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Hypertens Res. 2014 May;37(5):432-7. doi: 10.1038/hr.2013.142. Epub 2013 Oct 10.
10
Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of two fixed-dose combinations of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide compared with valsartan monotherapy in patients with stage 2 or 3 systolic hypertension: an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial.缬沙坦与氢氯噻嗪两种固定剂量复方制剂与缬沙坦单药治疗对2或3期收缩期高血压患者的降压疗效及耐受性比较:一项为期8周的随机、双盲、平行组试验
Clin Ther. 2005 Jul;27(7):1013-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.07.010.

引用本文的文献

1
Identification of an alternative ligand-binding pocket in peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma and its correlated selective agonist for promoting beige adipocyte differentiation.在过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ中鉴定出一个替代性配体结合口袋及其相关的选择性激动剂,用于促进米色脂肪细胞分化。
MedComm (2020). 2024 Jul 10;5(7):e650. doi: 10.1002/mco2.650. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Valsartan attenuates LPS-induced ALI by modulating NF-κB and MAPK pathways.缬沙坦通过调节核因子κB(NF-κB)和丝裂原活化蛋白激酶(MAPK)信号通路减轻脂多糖(LPS)诱导的急性肺损伤(ALI)。
Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jan 15;15:1321095. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1321095. eCollection 2024.
3
Efficacy and Safety of Azilsartan Medoxomil and Telmisartan in Hypertensive Patients: A Randomized, Assessor-Blinded Study.
阿齐沙坦酯和替米沙坦治疗高血压患者的疗效与安全性:一项随机、评估者盲法研究。
Saudi J Med Med Sci. 2020 May-Aug;8(2):87-94. doi: 10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_19_19. Epub 2020 Apr 17.