Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
Invest Radiol. 2013 Apr;48(4):206-12. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e31827efc3a.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) enables dose reduction over adaptive iterative reconstruction (ASIR) while maintaining diagnostic performance.
In this institutional review board-approved and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study, 59 patients (mean [SD] age, 64.7 [13.4] years) gave informed consent to undergo reference-, low-, and ultralow-dose chest computed tomography (CT) with 64-row multidetector CT. The reference- and low-dose CT involved the use of automatic tube current modulation with fixed noise indices (31.5 and 70.44 at 0.625 mm, respectively) and were reconstructed with 50% ASIR-filtered back projection blending. The ultralow-dose CT was acquired with a fixed tube current-time product of 5 mA s and reconstructed with MBIR. Two radiologists evaluated 2.5- and 0.625-mm-slice-thick axial images from low-dose ASIR and ultralow-dose MBIR, recorded the pattern of each nodule candidate, and assigned each a confidence score. A reference standard was established by a consensus panel of 2 different radiologists, who identified 84 noncalcified nodules with diameters of 4 mm or greater on reference-dose ASIR (ground-glass opacity, n = 18; partly solid, n = 11; solid, n = 55). Sensitivity in nodule detection was assessed using the McNemar test. Jackknife alternative free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) analysis was applied to assess the results including confidence scores.
Compared with the low-dose CT, a 78.1% decrease in dose-length product was seen with the ultralow-dose CT. No significant differences were observed between the low-dose ASIR and the ultralow-dose MBIR for overall nodule detection in sensitivity (P = 0.48-0.69) or the JAFROC analysis (P = 0.57). Likewise, no significant differences were seen for ground-glass opacity, partly solid, or solid nodule detection in sensitivity (P = 0.08-0.65) or the JAFROC analysis (P = 0.21-0.90).
Model-based iterative reconstruction enables nearly an 80% reduction in radiation dose for chest CT from a low-dose level to an ultralow-dose level, without affecting nodule detectability.
本研究旨在评估模型迭代重建(MBIR)是否能在保持诊断性能的同时,降低自适应迭代重建(ASIR)的剂量。
本研究经机构审查委员会批准并符合《健康保险流通与责任法案》,共纳入 59 例患者(平均[标准差]年龄,64.7[13.4]岁),他们均签署知情同意书,同意行胸部 64 排多层 CT 参考剂量、低剂量和超低剂量扫描。参考剂量和低剂量扫描使用自动管电流调制,噪声指数固定(分别为 31.5 和 70.44,层厚 0.625mm),并以 50%ASIR 滤波反投影混合重建。超低剂量扫描使用固定管电流时间乘积 5mA·s,MBIR 重建。2 位放射科医生评估低剂量 ASIR 和超低剂量 MBIR 的 2.5-mm 和 0.625-mm 层厚轴位图像,记录每个结节候选者的模式,并为每个结节分配信心评分。通过 2 位不同放射科医生组成的共识小组建立参考标准,该小组在参考剂量 ASIR 上确定了 84 个直径≥4mm 的非钙化结节(磨玻璃密度影 18 个,部分实性结节 11 个,实性结节 55 个)。采用 McNemar 检验评估结节检出的敏感性。应用刀切替代自由响应接收器操作特征(JAFROC)分析评估包括信心评分在内的结果。
与低剂量 CT 相比,超低剂量 CT 的剂量长度乘积降低了 78.1%。超低剂量 MBIR 与低剂量 ASIR 比较,在总体结节检出的敏感性(P=0.48-0.69)或 JAFROC 分析(P=0.57)中无显著差异。同样,在磨玻璃密度影、部分实性或实性结节的检出敏感性(P=0.08-0.65)或 JAFROC 分析(P=0.21-0.90)中无显著差异。
MBIR 可使胸部 CT 从低剂量水平降至超低剂量水平,同时降低近 80%的辐射剂量,而不影响结节的检出率。