Department of Medical Imaging, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, 305 Zhongshan East Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, China.
Journal of Medical Postgraduates, Affiliated Jinling Hospital, Medical School of Nanjing University, 305 Zhongshan East Road, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210002, China.
Biomed Res Int. 2020 Jul 13;2020:6909130. doi: 10.1155/2020/6909130. eCollection 2020.
To assess the impact of sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE) on risk category for coronary artery disease by combining coronary calcium score measurement and coronary CT angiography (CCTA).
Eighty-nine patients (64.0% male) older than 18 years (64.4 ± 10.3 years) underwent coronary artery calcium scanning and prospectively ECG-triggered sequential CCTA examination. All raw data acquired in coronary artery calcium scanning were reconstructed by both filtered back projection (FBP) and SAFIRE algorithms with 5 different levels. Objective image quality and calcium quantification were evaluated and compared between FBP and all SAFIRE levels by the Sphericity Assumed test or Greenhouse-Geisser correction coefficient. Coronary artery stenosis was assessed in CCTA. Risk categories of all patients and of the patients with coronary artery stenosis in CCTA were compared between FBP and all SAFIRE levels by the Friedman test.
The reconstruction protocol from traditional FBP to SAFIRE 5 was associated with a gradual reduction in CT value and image noise ( < 0.001) but associated with a gradual improvement in the signal-to-noise ratio ( < 0.001). There was a gradual reduction in coronary calcification quantification (Agatston score: from 73.5 in FBP to 38.1 in SAFIRE 5, < 0.001) from traditional FBP to SAFIRE 5. There was a significant difference for the risk category between FBP and all levels of SAFIRE in all patients (from 3.5 in FBP to 3.2 in SAFIRE 5, < 0.001) and in the patients with coronary artery stenosis in CCTA (from 4.0 in FBP to 3.6 in SAFIRE 5, < 0.001).
SAFIRE significantly reduces coronary calcification quantification compared to FBP, resulting in the reduction of risk categories based on the Agatston score. The risk categories of the patients with coronary artery stenosis in CCTA may also decline. Thus, SAFIRE may lead risk categories to underestimate the existence of significant coronary artery stenosis.
通过结合冠状动脉钙化评分测量和冠状动脉 CT 血管造影(CCTA),评估正弦图确认迭代重建(SAFIRE)对冠状动脉疾病风险类别的影响。
89 名年龄大于 18 岁的患者(64.0%为男性,64.4±10.3 岁)接受了冠状动脉钙扫描,并前瞻性地进行了心电图触发的连续 CCTA 检查。所有在冠状动脉钙扫描中采集的原始数据均采用滤波反投影(FBP)和 SAFIRE 算法以 5 个不同的水平进行重建。通过 Sphericity Assumed 检验或 Greenhouse-Geisser 校正系数评估并比较 FBP 和所有 SAFIRE 水平之间的客观图像质量和钙定量。在 CCTA 中评估冠状动脉狭窄。通过 Friedman 检验比较 FBP 和所有 SAFIRE 水平之间所有患者和 CCTA 中存在冠状动脉狭窄患者的风险类别。
从传统的 FBP 到 SAFIRE 5 的重建方案与 CT 值和图像噪声的逐渐降低相关(<0.001),但与信噪比的逐渐提高相关(<0.001)。从传统的 FBP 到 SAFIRE 5,冠状动脉钙化定量(Agatston 评分:从 73.5 降至 38.1,<0.001)逐渐降低。在所有患者(从 FBP 的 3.5 降至 SAFIRE 5 的 3.2,<0.001)和在 CCTA 中存在冠状动脉狭窄的患者中,FBP 和所有 SAFIRE 水平之间的风险类别存在显著差异(从 FBP 的 4.0 降至 SAFIRE 5 的 3.6,<0.001)。
与 FBP 相比,SAFIRE 显著降低了冠状动脉钙化定量,从而降低了基于 Agatston 评分的风险类别。CCTA 中存在冠状动脉狭窄的患者的风险类别也可能下降。因此,SAFIRE 可能导致风险类别低估了显著的冠状动脉狭窄的存在。