Suppr超能文献

[缺铁性贫血——生化及血液学检查结果解读]

[Iron deficiency anaemia--interpretation of biochemical and haematological findings].

作者信息

Hagve Tor-Arne, Lilleholt Kristin, Svendsen Marianne

机构信息

Divisjon for diagnostikk og teknologi/TLMB, Akershus universitetssykehus, Norway.

出版信息

Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 2013 Jan 22;133(2):161-4. doi: 10.4045/tidsskr.12.0192.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Iron deficiency and iron deficiency anaemia are frequent problems in both the primary and the specialist health services. It is important to detect iron deficiency and to determine the causal relationship because iron deficiency may be secondary to a serious disease. The diagnosis of iron deficiency is largely based on biochemical and haematological laboratory findings, but there is no standardisation or consensus on the interpretation of these findings.

METHOD

Non-systematic search in the PubMed database with a discretionary selection of articles, based on the authors' knowledge of the field.

RESULTS

Ferritin measurement is the most important analysis in the study of iron deficiency, but there is no consensus on the diagnostic cut-off. It is usual in Norway today to use a ferritin level of < 12-20 μg/L, but at this low level the sensitivity for detecting iron deficiency is very low. A number of studies show that if the diagnostic cut-off is increased to the order of 30 μg/L the sensitivity is significantly higher for only a small reduction in specificity.

INTERPRETATION

When studying iron deficiency as a cause of anaemia, the diagnostic cut-off for detecting deficiency should be higher than that used today. The ferritin level increases with inflammation and ought in practice to be considered in conjunction with the CRP level. The level of transferrin receptor in plasma increases with iron deficiency without being influenced by inflammation and is therefore a good supplement to ferritin measurement. Measurement of iron, transferrin and transferrin saturation provides little information additional to that provided by ferritin in iron deficiency studies.

摘要

背景

缺铁和缺铁性贫血在初级卫生服务和专科卫生服务中都是常见问题。检测缺铁并确定因果关系很重要,因为缺铁可能是严重疾病的继发症状。缺铁的诊断很大程度上基于生化和血液学实验室检查结果,但对于这些结果的解读尚无标准化或共识。

方法

基于作者对该领域的了解,在PubMed数据库中进行非系统性检索,并酌情选择文章。

结果

铁蛋白检测是缺铁研究中最重要的分析,但诊断临界值尚无共识。如今在挪威,通常使用低于12 - 20μg/L的铁蛋白水平,但在此低水平下,检测缺铁的敏感性非常低。多项研究表明,如果将诊断临界值提高到30μg/L左右,敏感性会显著提高,而特异性仅略有降低。

解读

在将缺铁作为贫血病因进行研究时,检测缺铁的诊断临界值应高于目前使用的临界值。铁蛋白水平会随炎症而升高,实际上应结合CRP水平来考虑。血浆中转铁蛋白受体水平会随缺铁而升高,且不受炎症影响,因此是铁蛋白检测的良好补充。在缺铁研究中,铁、转铁蛋白和转铁蛋白饱和度的检测所提供的信息,相较于铁蛋白提供的信息并无太多额外价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验