Chen Yen-Cheng, Hung Szu-Chun, Tarng Der-Cherng
Institutes of Physiology and Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2006 Jun;47(6):1036-44. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2006.02.180.
The diagnostic power of the transferrin receptor-ferritin (TfR-F) index for identification of iron responsiveness in long-term hemodialysis (HD) patients compared with the routine markers recommended by the current US and European guidelines was appraised.
Initially, 121 long-term HD patients with a serum ferritin level less than 800 microg/L and on recombinant erythropoietin (rHuEPO) therapy for longer than 6 months were enrolled for intravenous iron (IVFE) supplementation (100 mg of iron polymaltose 3 times/wk for 4 weeks, then 100 mg every 2 weeks for 5 months). Routine iron tests (ie, serum ferritin and transferrin saturation [TSAT]), TfR-F index calculated by the ratio of soluble TfR to log ferritin level, hematocrit, hemoglobin, red blood cell count, and serum high-sensitive C-reactive protein were examined at baseline. Hematocrit and hemoglobin were followed up every 2 weeks during the study period.
One hundred patients (52 men, 48 women; mean age, 59 years) completed this study. Fifty-two patients were IVFE responders, defined as an increase in hematocrit greater than 3% and/or a decrease in rHuEPO dose greater than 30% of baseline values at the end of the study, and 48 nonresponders did not fulfill these criteria. Of 52 responders, only 14 patients (27%) could be recognized for iron deficiency by means of routine iron tests (ferritin < 100 microg/L and/or TSAT < 20%). Thirty-three responders (63%) could be further identified for iron deficiency by using TfR-F index (> 0.6), but 5 (10%) still could not by either method. Analyses by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves showed that a cutoff value greater than 0.6 for TfR-F index had greater sensitivity (90%) for the detection of iron deficiency than ferritin level less than 100 microg/L (29%) and TSAT less than 20% (6%). TfR-F index showed a greater area under the ROC curve than ferritin level (P < 0.05) and TSAT (P < 0.001).
TfR-F index is superior to routine tests for predicting response to IVFE supplementation in long-term HD patients. Our study indicates that TfR-F index is a new and surrogate marker to estimate body iron stores and guide IVFE therapy for long-term HD patients.
评估转铁蛋白受体 - 铁蛋白(TfR - F)指数相较于美国和欧洲现行指南推荐的常规指标,用于识别长期血液透析(HD)患者铁反应性的诊断效能。
最初,纳入121例血清铁蛋白水平低于800μg/L且接受重组促红细胞生成素(rHuEPO)治疗超过6个月的长期HD患者,进行静脉补铁(IVFE)(100mg聚麦芽糖铁,每周3次,共4周,然后每2周100mg,共5个月)。在基线时检测常规铁指标(即血清铁蛋白和转铁蛋白饱和度[TSAT])、通过可溶性TfR与铁蛋白水平对数之比计算的TfR - F指数、血细胞比容、血红蛋白、红细胞计数和血清高敏C反应蛋白。在研究期间,每2周随访一次血细胞比容和血红蛋白。
100例患者(52例男性,48例女性;平均年龄59岁)完成了本研究。52例患者为IVFE反应者,定义为在研究结束时血细胞比容增加超过3%和/或rHuEPO剂量减少超过基线值的30%,48例无反应者未达到这些标准。在52例反应者中,仅14例患者(27%)通过常规铁指标(铁蛋白<100μg/L和/或TSAT<20%)可被识别为缺铁。使用TfR - F指数(>0.6)可进一步识别33例反应者(63%)为缺铁,但仍有5例(10%)两种方法均无法识别。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析表明,TfR - F指数>0.6的临界值对缺铁检测的敏感性(90%)高于铁蛋白水平<100μg/L(29%)和TSAT<20%(6%)。TfR - F指数在ROC曲线下的面积大于铁蛋白水平(P<0.05)和TSAT(P<0.001)。
TfR - F指数在预测长期HD患者对IVFE补充的反应方面优于常规检测。我们的研究表明,TfR - F指数是评估长期HD患者体内铁储备和指导IVFE治疗的一种新的替代标志物。