• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

参加儿科和内科培训项目的住院医师培训时长的差异。

Variation in lengths of training among residents enrolled in pediatrics and internal medicine training programs.

作者信息

Hoekelman R A, Parker R M

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Rochester School of Medicine, NY.

出版信息

Acad Med. 1990 Apr;65(4):257-66.

PMID:2334508
Abstract

Data were gathered in 1987 from 180 pediatrics and 302 internal medicine residency training programs about (1) the length of vacation provided their residents, (2) time allowed them for absence from work for reasons other than vacation, (3) how many of them during the previous three years had been required to extend their training to make up absences from work, and (4) whether a system was in place to cover their unexpected absences from work. All these variables affect the duration--but not necessarily the quality--of training that residents actually experience. The data show that these variables demonstrated wide ranges that depended on the postgraduate year of training, the discipline, the program size, and the program type (university, university-affiliated, freestanding, or military). The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, training program directors, and the American Board of Pediatrics and the American Board of Internal Medicine each need to consider these variables in making their respective decisions about accrediting training programs, verifying the clinical competence of trainees, and certifying program graduates.

摘要

1987年收集了来自180个儿科和302个内科住院医师培训项目的数据,内容包括:(1)为住院医师提供的休假时长;(2)因休假以外原因允许他们缺勤的时间;(3)在过去三年中有多少人曾被要求延长培训以弥补工作缺勤;(4)是否有一个系统来应对他们意外的工作缺勤。所有这些变量都会影响住院医师实际经历的培训时长——但不一定影响培训质量。数据显示,这些变量呈现出很大的范围,这取决于培训的研究生年级、学科、项目规模和项目类型(大学、大学附属、独立或军事)。毕业后医学教育认证委员会、培训项目主任以及美国儿科学会和美国内科医学委员会在就认证培训项目、核实受训人员的临床能力以及认证项目毕业生做出各自决定时,都需要考虑这些变量。

相似文献

1
Variation in lengths of training among residents enrolled in pediatrics and internal medicine training programs.参加儿科和内科培训项目的住院医师培训时长的差异。
Acad Med. 1990 Apr;65(4):257-66.
2
Combined internal medicine/pediatric residency training programs.内科/儿科联合住院医师培训项目
Pediatrics. 1989 Jul;84(1):94-7.
3
Experiences with a combined residency in internal and preventive medicine.内科与预防医学联合住院医师培训的经验
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Oct;35(4):393-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.06.028.
4
Adolescent medicine training in pediatric residency programs.儿科住院医师培训中的青少年医学培训。
Pediatrics. 2010 Jan;125(1):165-72. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3740. Epub 2009 Dec 7.
5
Ethics and professionalism in the pediatric curriculum: a survey of pediatric program directors.儿科课程中的伦理与职业素养:儿科项目主任调查
Pediatrics. 2009 Oct;124(4):1143-51. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-0658. Epub 2009 Sep 14.
6
Training experiences of U.S. combined internal medicine and pediatrics residents.美国内科与儿科联合住院医师的培训经历。
Acad Med. 2006 May;81(5):440-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ACM.0000222276.83082.87.
7
Internal medicine resident perceptions of optimal training duration.内科住院医师对最佳培训时长的看法。
Acad Med. 2007 Oct;82(10):996-9. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31814a5192.
8
Results of the 2004 survey of the American Association of Academic Chief Residents in Radiology.2004年美国放射学住院总医师协会调查结果。
Acad Radiol. 2005 Mar;12(3):373-8. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.12.014.
9
What predicts residency accreditation cycle length? Results of a national survey.什么因素能预测住院医师培训认证周期的时长?一项全国性调查的结果。
Acad Med. 2009 Mar;84(3):356-61. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31819707cf.
10
Are internal medicine residency programs adequately preparing physicians to care for the baby boomers? A national survey from the Association of Directors of Geriatric Academic Programs Status of Geriatrics Workforce Study.内科住院医师培训项目是否在充分培养医生以照顾婴儿潮一代?老年医学学术项目主任协会劳动力研究现状的一项全国性调查。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006 Oct;54(10):1603-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00895.x.