Suppr超能文献

三种免疫球蛋白G检测方法用于诊断新生羊驼被动免疫转移失败的比较。

Comparison of three immunoglobulin G assays for the diagnosis of failure of passive transfer of immunity in neonatal alpacas.

作者信息

Pinn Toby L, Gagliardo Lucille F, Purdy Steve R, Appleton Judith A, Stokol Tracy

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

出版信息

J Vet Diagn Invest. 2013 Jan;25(1):91-8. doi: 10.1177/1040638712472182.

Abstract

Measurement of serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) is used for the assessment of passive transfer of immunity in neonatal crias, with an IgG concentration <10 g/l being suggestive of failure of passive transfer (FPT). The purpose of the current study was to determine whether 3 commercially available immunologic assays yielded comparable results for IgG in alpacas. Serum samples from 91 alpacas were used and were stored frozen until batch analysis on the same day with the 3 assays. Immunoglobulin G was measured by radial immunodiffusion (RID) and 2 immunoturbidimetric (IT) assays (IT1, configured for automated chemistry analyzers; IT2, a point-of-care test). Median IgG concentrations were significantly different between the 3 assays, with the RID (median: 15 g/l) and IT1 (median: 16 g/l) assays, which used the same standard, yielding significantly higher IgG values than IT2 (median: 11 g/l). Results indicated a diagnostic discordance in 1-17% of samples at an IgG threshold of 10 g/l. Protein electrophoresis revealed that the RID and IT1 standard contained mostly albumin (>60%), whereas the IT2 standard consisted of beta and gamma globulins. The discrepant results between assays IT1 and IT2 were eliminated when the same standard was used (IT1: median 11 g/l; IT2: 10 g/l; n = 19 and 17, respectively). The IT1 assay had the highest precision, while the RID assay had the lowest. The results indicate that camelid IgG measurement is highly dependent on the assay standard and is not directly comparable between assays, potentially resulting in underdiagnosis of FPT in some crias.

摘要

测量血清免疫球蛋白G(IgG)用于评估新生羊驼免疫的被动转移情况,IgG浓度<10g/L提示被动转移失败(FPT)。本研究的目的是确定3种市售免疫测定法对羊驼IgG的检测结果是否具有可比性。使用了91只羊驼的血清样本,样本冷冻保存,直到同一天用这3种测定法进行批量分析。通过放射免疫扩散法(RID)和2种免疫比浊法(IT)(IT1,配置用于自动化学分析仪;IT2,即时检测)测量免疫球蛋白G。3种测定法的IgG浓度中位数有显著差异,使用相同标准的RID(中位数:15g/L)和IT1(中位数:16g/L)测定法得出的IgG值显著高于IT2(中位数:11g/L)。结果表明,在IgG阈值为10g/L时,1%-17%的样本存在诊断不一致。蛋白质电泳显示,RID和IT1标准品主要包含白蛋白(>60%),而IT2标准品由β球蛋白和γ球蛋白组成。当使用相同标准时,IT1和IT2测定法之间的差异结果消除(IT1:中位数11g/L;IT2:10g/L;n分别为19和17)。IT1测定法的精密度最高,而RID测定法的精密度最低。结果表明,骆驼科动物IgG的测量高度依赖于测定标准,不同测定法之间不能直接比较,这可能导致一些羊驼幼崽FPT的诊断不足。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验