• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移植前终末期肝病模型评分可预测肝移植后真菌感染的发生率。

Pretransplant model for end stage liver disease score predicts posttransplant incidence of fungal infections after liver transplantation.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg, Rudolf-Buchheim-Straße 7,Giessen, Germany.

出版信息

Mycoses. 2013 May;56(3):350-7. doi: 10.1111/myc.12041. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1111/myc.12041
PMID:23346877
Abstract

Liver transplant recipients are at a significant risk for invasive fungal infections (IFI). This retrospective study evaluated the impact of the pretransplant model for end stage liver disease (MELD) on the incidence of posttransplant IFI in a single centre. From 2004 to 2008, 385 liver transplantations were included, from which 210 transplantations were conducted allocated by Child Turcotte Pugh and 175 were allocated by MELD score. Both groups differed regarding the age of transplant recipients (50.1 ± 10.7 vs. 52.5 ± 9.9, P = 0.036), pretransplant MELD score (16.43 ± 8.33 vs. 18.29 ± 9.05), rate of re-transplantations, duration of surgery, demand in blood transfusions and rates of renal impairments. In the MELD era, higher incidences of IFI (pre-MELD 11.9%, MELD 24.0%, P < 0.05) and Candida infections (9% vs. 18.9%, P < 0.05) were observed. There was no difference in the incidence of probable or possible aspergillosis. Mortality, length of stay in intensive care or hospital, and duration of mechanical ventilation did not differ between the pre-MELD and MELD era. Regardless the date of transplantation, patients with fungi-positive samples showed higher mortality rates than patients without. MELD score was analysed as independent predictors for posttransplant IFI. Higher MELD scores predispose to a more problematic postoperative course and are associated with an increase in fungal infections.

摘要

肝移植受者存在侵袭性真菌感染 (IFI) 的高风险。本回顾性研究评估了肝移植前终末期肝病模型 (MELD) 评分对单一中心肝移植后 IFI 发生率的影响。2004 年至 2008 年,共纳入 385 例肝移植患者,其中 210 例采用 Child-Turcotte-Pugh 评分分配,175 例采用 MELD 评分分配。两组在肝移植受者年龄(50.1±10.7 岁 vs. 52.5±9.9 岁,P=0.036)、术前 MELD 评分(16.43±8.33 分 vs. 18.29±9.05 分)、再次肝移植率、手术持续时间、输血需求和肾功能不全发生率方面存在差异。在 MELD 时代,IFI(前 MELD 组 11.9%,MELD 组 24.0%,P<0.05)和念珠菌感染(9% vs. 18.9%,P<0.05)的发生率更高。可能或可疑曲霉菌病的发生率无差异。MELD 时代和前 MELD 时代的死亡率、重症监护病房或医院停留时间和机械通气时间无差异。无论移植日期如何,真菌阳性样本的患者死亡率均高于真菌阴性样本的患者。MELD 评分被分析为移植后 IFI 的独立预测因子。较高的 MELD 评分预示着更棘手的术后过程,并与真菌感染的增加相关。

相似文献

1
Pretransplant model for end stage liver disease score predicts posttransplant incidence of fungal infections after liver transplantation.移植前终末期肝病模型评分可预测肝移植后真菌感染的发生率。
Mycoses. 2013 May;56(3):350-7. doi: 10.1111/myc.12041. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
2
Fungal infections after liver transplantation: outcomes and risk factors revisited in the MELD era.肝移植后真菌感染:MELD 时代的结局和危险因素再探讨。
Clin Transplant. 2013 Jul-Aug;27(4):E454-61. doi: 10.1111/ctr.12129. Epub 2013 May 9.
3
Liver Transplantation in Patients With Pretransplant Aspergillus Colonization: Is It Safe to Proceed?肝移植患者移植前曲霉菌定植:继续进行是否安全?
Transplantation. 2021 Mar 1;105(3):586-592. doi: 10.1097/TP.0000000000003276.
4
Relevance of Candida and other mycoses for morbidity and mortality in severe sepsis and septic shock due to peritonitis.念珠菌及其他真菌病与腹膜炎所致严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的发病率及死亡率的相关性。
Mycoses. 2015 Jul;58(7):399-407. doi: 10.1111/myc.12331. Epub 2015 May 25.
5
MELD score measured day 10 after orthotopic liver transplantation predicts death and re-transplantation within the first year.原位肝移植术后第10天测得的终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分可预测患者在第一年内的死亡和再次移植情况。
Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016 Nov;51(11):1360-6. doi: 10.1080/00365521.2016.1196497. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
6
The evolution of liver transplantation during 3 decades: analysis of 5347 consecutive liver transplants at a single center.30 年来肝移植的演变:单中心 5347 例连续肝移植分析。
Ann Surg. 2013 Sep;258(3):409-21. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a15db4.
7
Infectious complications in the era of MELD.终末期肝病模型时代的感染并发症
Ann Transplant. 2015 May 28;20:297-302. doi: 10.12659/AOT.893122.
8
Liver Transplantation Outcomes in Recipients with High Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) Scores: The Relevance of MELD Scores.终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分高的受者的肝移植结局:MELD评分的相关性
Ann Transplant. 2017 Apr 25;22:251-256. doi: 10.12659/aot.901045.
9
The impact of the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) on liver transplantation in one center in Brazil.终末期肝病模型(MELD)对巴西某一中心肝移植的影响。
Arq Gastroenterol. 2010 Jul-Sep;47(3):233-7. doi: 10.1590/s0004-28032010000300004.
10
High MELD score does not adversely affect outcome of living donor liver transplantation: Experience in 1000 recipients.高终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分对活体肝移植受者的预后并无不利影响:1000例受者的经验
Clin Transplant. 2017 Aug;31(8). doi: 10.1111/ctr.13006.

引用本文的文献

1
The predictors of fungal infections after liver transplantation and the influence of fungal infections on outcomes.肝移植后真菌感染的预测因素及真菌感染对结局的影响。
Clin Exp Med. 2024 Jul 3;24(1):144. doi: 10.1007/s10238-024-01419-8.
2
Cutaneous and renal aspergillosis resulting from orthotopic liver transplantation.原位肝移植导致的皮肤和肾脏曲霉菌病
BMJ Case Rep. 2023 Nov 22;16(11):e256974. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2023-256974.
3
Randomized trial of micafungin for the prevention of invasive fungal infection in high-risk liver transplant recipients.
米卡芬净预防高危肝移植受者侵袭性真菌感染的随机试验。
Clin Infect Dis. 2015 Apr 1;60(7):997-1006. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu1128. Epub 2014 Dec 17.
4
Targeted versus universal antifungal prophylaxis among liver transplant recipients.肝移植受者中靶向性抗真菌预防与普遍性抗真菌预防的比较
Am J Transplant. 2015 Jan;15(1):180-9. doi: 10.1111/ajt.12993. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
5
Effect of delayed CNI-based immunosuppression with Advagraf® on liver function after MELD-based liver transplantation [IMUTECT].基于终末期肝病模型(MELD)评分的肝移植术后使用Advagraf®进行延迟的基于钙调神经磷酸酶抑制剂(CNI)的免疫抑制对肝功能的影响[IMUTECT研究]
BMC Surg. 2014 Sep 1;14:64. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-64.