López-Candales Angel, Edelman Kathy
Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0542, USA.
Echocardiography. 2013 Jul;30(6):649-57. doi: 10.1111/echo.12120. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
Even though chronic pulmonary hypertension (cPH) and acute pulmonary embolism (aPE) increase pulmonary vascular resistance and result in right ventricular (RV) dilatation and systolic dysfunction; both conditions operate through drastically different mechanisms. Unfortunately, simple echocardiographic examination might be insufficient to distinguish both entities. This study attempted to determine which objective measures would be useful in differentiating aPE from cPH.
Standard measures of main RV as well as RV outflow tract (RVOT) size and systolic performance calculations were retrospectively measured from 15 patients with confirmed aPE by chest computed tomography and compared with similar data collected from the same number of age-matched patients with moderate (mcPH), severe (scPH), and patients without PH.
Although a positive McConnell sign was seen in 60% of aPE patients and in 17% of the cPH patients, all aPE had a profound reduction in RVOT systolic excursion when compared with cPH patients. Furthermore, maximal tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, velocity time integral of the RVOT ejection signal, end-systolic or end-diastolic RV to left ventricle (LV) dimension ratio were not useful to distinguish aPE from any of the 2 forms of cPH.
This study demonstrated that measurement of RVOT systolic excursion not only is feasible but also extremely useful in identifying aPE and it is particularly helpful in differentiating it from patients with either mcPH or scPH. This variable might be useful to estimate the global impairment in RV contractility and acute hemodynamic derangement seen in aPE.
尽管慢性肺动脉高压(cPH)和急性肺栓塞(aPE)都会增加肺血管阻力,并导致右心室(RV)扩张和收缩功能障碍,但这两种情况的发病机制截然不同。遗憾的是,单纯的超声心动图检查可能不足以区分这两种疾病。本研究试图确定哪些客观指标有助于鉴别aPE和cPH。
回顾性测量了15例经胸部计算机断层扫描确诊为aPE患者的右心室主要指标以及右心室流出道(RVOT)大小和收缩功能计算值,并与从相同数量的年龄匹配的中度(mcPH)、重度(scPH)肺动脉高压患者以及无肺动脉高压患者收集的类似数据进行比较。
虽然60%的aPE患者和17%的cPH患者出现了阳性麦康奈尔征,但与cPH患者相比,所有aPE患者的RVOT收缩期偏移均显著降低。此外,三尖瓣环平面最大收缩期偏移、RVOT射血信号的速度时间积分、收缩末期或舒张末期右心室与左心室(LV)尺寸比对于区分aPE与两种形式的cPH均无帮助。
本研究表明,测量RVOT收缩期偏移不仅可行,而且在识别aPE方面非常有用,尤其有助于将其与mcPH或scPH患者区分开来。该变量可能有助于评估aPE中右心室收缩力的整体损害和急性血流动力学紊乱。