Neulen Axel, Greke Christian, Prokesch Esther, König Jochem, Wertheimer Daniel, Giese Alf
Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55101 Mainz, Germany.
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Aug;115(8):1382-8. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.12.025. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
Principles and accuracy of image-guided transcranial Doppler (IG TCD) sonography have been published recently. However, it remains open whether combination of image guidance and TCD offers an additional clinical advantage. This study scores the accuracy of conventional TCD examinations and investigates the potential improvement of TCD data integrity and reliability regarding the additional use of IG.
Conventional TCD was performed by a group of experienced investigators, who were blinded to images of a navigation system tracking the Doppler probe, whereas an independent observer documented the TCD findings, acquired by the investigators, due to saving spatial data of the TCD sample volume using IG for subsequent analysis. In a second set of experiments, image guidance was available to investigators without any previous TCD experience.
The analysis of 3D data of vessels (n=173) labeled by experienced investigators in conventional TCD, revealed a rate of 37% misinterpreted Doppler signals regarding the target vessel. Correctness of labeling was comparable between the different vascular segments. The rate of correct labeling was higher for right- (69%) than for left-sided vessels (57%). In comparison, by using IG, TCD investigators without any previous TCD experience achieved a significantly lower rate of 10% (n=39) mislabeled vessels.
Our data suggest, that misinterpretation of the vascular source of the Doppler signal is a common source of errors in conventional TCD. Visualization of the vascular anatomy by image guidance offers improved accuracy and reliability of TCD results and may positively influence the learning curve for inexperienced investigators.
图像引导经颅多普勒(IG TCD)超声检查的原理和准确性最近已有报道。然而,图像引导与TCD相结合是否具有额外的临床优势仍不明确。本研究对传统TCD检查的准确性进行评分,并研究关于额外使用IG时TCD数据完整性和可靠性的潜在改善情况。
由一组经验丰富的研究人员进行传统TCD检查,他们对跟踪多普勒探头的导航系统图像不知情,而一名独立观察者记录研究人员获得的TCD结果,这是因为使用IG保存TCD样本容积的空间数据以便后续分析。在第二组实验中,为没有任何TCD经验的研究人员提供图像引导。
对经验丰富的研究人员在传统TCD中标注的血管三维数据(n = 173)进行分析,发现关于目标血管的多普勒信号误判率为37%。不同血管节段的标注正确性相当。右侧血管(69%)的正确标注率高于左侧血管(57%)。相比之下,使用IG时,没有任何TCD经验的TCD研究人员实现的血管误标率显著降低,为10%(n = 39)。
我们的数据表明,多普勒信号血管来源的误判是传统TCD中常见的误差来源。通过图像引导可视化血管解剖结构可提高TCD结果的准确性和可靠性,并可能对缺乏经验的研究人员的学习曲线产生积极影响。