Marché S, Van Borm S, Lambrecht B, Houdart P, van den Berg T
Avian Virology and Immunology Unit, Veterinary and Agrochemical Research Center, Brussels, Belgium.
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2014 Dec;61(6):526-36. doi: 10.1111/tbed.12056. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
In December 2008, bird species in two geographically distant holdings were found positive for H5 viruses following the annual Avian influenza serological screening in Belgium. The virological tests performed identified in one holding a low-pathogenic avian influenza (LPAI) virus subtype H5N2, and a H5 LPAI virus was identified by real-time PCR and direct sequencing at the second holding. The first farm was an outdoor mixed holding housing ornamental birds and poultry (n = 6000) and the second a free-range geese breeding farm (n = 1500). No clinical signs or mortalities were reported. Control measures defined by Council Directive 2005/94/EC were followed, including notification to the European Commission via the Animal Disease Notification System and to the World Organization for Animal Health, and poultry were killed, while ornamental bird species were quarantined. Partial sequencing of the H5N2 virus haemagglutinin and neuraminidase N2 gene sequences revealed a close homology to some recent LPAI isolates identified from wild birds in Germany and Italy and from wild birds in Eurasia and Africa, respectively. It is noteworthy that, these two holdings were already H5 positive based on HI test results carried out during the previous serological screening; however, no virus was detected at that time. To have a better understanding of the potential 'silent' circulation of the H5N2 isolate in the field, experimental infections of chickens and turkeys were performed. The low excretion detected might in part explain viral persistence not associated with spread between gallinaceous birds in the same holding, indicating that the H5N2 LPAI isolate was not fully adapted to these two poultry species. Our results highlighted limitations to only using serological screening for the early detection of LPAI in an 'at-risk farm', suggesting that virological and serological monitoring tests be applied simultaneously as a means of testing animals in 'at-risk farms'.
2008年12月,在比利时进行年度禽流感血清学筛查后,在两个地理位置相距遥远的养殖场中发现鸟类感染了H5病毒。进行的病毒学检测在一个养殖场中鉴定出一种低致病性禽流感(LPAI)病毒H5N2亚型,在第二个养殖场通过实时PCR和直接测序鉴定出一种H5 LPAI病毒。第一个养殖场是一个户外混合养殖场,饲养观赏鸟和家禽(n = 6000),第二个是一个自由放养的鹅养殖场(n = 1500)。未报告临床症状或死亡情况。遵循了理事会指令2005/94/EC规定的控制措施,包括通过动物疾病通报系统向欧盟委员会和世界动物卫生组织通报,家禽被扑杀,而观赏鸟类被隔离。对H5N2病毒血凝素和神经氨酸酶N2基因序列的部分测序显示,它们分别与最近从德国和意大利的野生鸟类以及欧亚大陆和非洲的野生鸟类中鉴定出的一些LPAI分离株具有密切的同源性。值得注意的是,根据之前血清学筛查期间进行的HI试验结果,这两个养殖场已经呈H5阳性;然而,当时未检测到病毒。为了更好地了解H5N2分离株在野外可能的“隐性”传播情况,对鸡和火鸡进行了实验感染。检测到的低排泄量可能部分解释了病毒在同一养殖场的鸡形目鸟类之间未传播的持续性,这表明H5N2 LPAI分离株并未完全适应这两种家禽物种。我们的结果突出了仅使用血清学筛查在“风险养殖场”早期检测LPAI的局限性,建议同时应用病毒学和血清学监测试验作为检测“风险养殖场”动物的一种手段。