Melbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne and Melbourne Health, VIC, Australia.
Schizophr Res. 2013 Mar;144(1-3):31-6. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.12.013. Epub 2013 Jan 21.
Theory of mind (ToM) deficit is a well-established feature of schizophrenia and has been suggested as a vulnerability marker of this disorder. However, as most of this evidence is based on studies in chronic patients, it is less clear whether ToM is impaired prior to or following the onset of a first-episode and whether it is evident in unaffected relatives of patients. In this meta-analysis, ToM performance of 3005 individuals with first-episode psychosis (FEP), individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR) and unaffected relatives were compared with 1351 healthy controls. ToM was substantially impaired in first-episode psychosis (Cohen d=1.0) and this deficit was comparable to findings in chronic patients. ToM was also impaired in unaffected relatives (d=0.37) and UHR subjects (d=0.45) and performances of these groups were intermediate between FES and healthy controls. Severity of ToM deficits in unaffected relatives and UHR subjects was similar to other cognitive deficits observed in these groups. Longitudinal studies of clinical and genetic high-risk subjects are necessary to investigate the trajectory of development of ToM deficits in schizophrenia.
心理理论(Theory of mind,ToM)缺陷是精神分裂症的一个既定特征,被认为是这种疾病的易感性标志物。然而,由于大多数此类证据都基于慢性患者的研究,因此尚不清楚心理理论是否在首次发作之前或之后受到损害,以及它是否在患者的未受影响的亲属中表现出来。在这项荟萃分析中,将 3005 名首发精神病(first-episode psychosis,FEP)患者、处于精神病超高风险(ultra-high risk for psychosis,UHR)状态的个体以及未受影响的亲属的心理理论表现与 1351 名健康对照者进行了比较。首发精神病患者的心理理论表现明显受损(Cohen d=1.0),这一缺陷与慢性患者的发现相当。未受影响的亲属(d=0.37)和 UHR 受试者(d=0.45)的心理理论也受到损害,这些群体的表现介于 FES 和健康对照组之间。未受影响的亲属和 UHR 受试者的心理理论缺陷严重程度与这些群体中观察到的其他认知缺陷相似。对临床和遗传高危受试者进行纵向研究,对于研究精神分裂症患者心理理论缺陷的发展轨迹是必要的。