Suppr超能文献

诊断:额缝嵴与额缝早闭

Making the diagnosis: metopic ridge versus metopic craniosynostosis.

作者信息

Birgfeld Craig B, Saltzman Babette S, Hing Anne V, Heike Carrie L, Khanna Paritosh C, Gruss Joseph S, Hopper Richard A

机构信息

From the University of Washington and Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, WA 98105, USA.

出版信息

J Craniofac Surg. 2013 Jan;24(1):178-85. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31826683d1.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The metopic suture is the only calvarial suture which normally closes during infancy. Upon closure, a palpable and visible ridge often forms which can be confused with metopic craniosynostosis. Metopic ridging (MR) is treated nonsurgically while metopic craniosynostosis (MCS) is treated surgically. Differentiating between the two is paramount; however, consensus is lacking about where a clear diagnostic threshold lies. The goal of this study is to describe the physical examination and CT scan characteristics which may help to differentiate between physiological closure of the metopic suture with ridging (MR) and MCS.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of all patients seen at Seattle Children's Hospital between 2004 and 2009 with the diagnosis of either MCS or MR (n = 282) was performed. Physical examination characteristics described by diagnosing practitioners were analyzed. Clinical photos were assessed by 3 expert raters to determine the importance of these characteristics. CT scan findings were abstracted and compared between the two diagnoses.

RESULTS

The "classic" triad of narrow forehead, biparietal widening, and hypotelorism was present in only 14% of patients with MCS. Ninety-eight percent of patients in both groups had a palpable metopic ridge. The photographic finding of narrow forehead and pterional constriction was present in all patients with MCS, but only in 11.2% and 2.8% of patients with MR. On CT scan, the presence of 3 or more MCS findings was diagnostic of MCS in 96% of patients. Patients with MCS were more likely to present before 6 months of age (66% vs. 32%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with MCS tend to present earlier than those with MR. Upon physical examination, the relationship between the lateral frontal bone and the lateral orbit is important in distinguishing between the two diagnoses. A CT scan can be helpful in making the diagnosis not to confirm a closed suture but to identify 3 or more MCS characteristics.

摘要

引言

额缝是颅骨中唯一在婴儿期正常闭合的缝线。闭合后,常形成可触及且可见的嵴,这可能与额缝早闭相混淆。额缝嵴(MR)采用非手术治疗,而额缝早闭(MCS)则采用手术治疗。区分两者至关重要;然而,对于明确的诊断阈值尚无共识。本研究的目的是描述体格检查和CT扫描特征,这些特征可能有助于区分生理性额缝闭合伴嵴形成(MR)和MCS。

方法

对2004年至2009年在西雅图儿童医院就诊且诊断为MCS或MR的所有患者(n = 282)进行回顾性病历审查。分析诊断医生描述的体格检查特征。由3名专家评估临床照片,以确定这些特征的重要性。提取CT扫描结果并在两种诊断之间进行比较。

结果

MCS患者中仅14%出现“典型”的三联征,即前额狭窄、双颞部增宽和眶距过窄。两组中98%的患者可触及额缝嵴。所有MCS患者均有前额狭窄和翼点狭窄的影像学表现,但MR患者中仅11.2%和2.8%有此表现。在CT扫描中,出现3个或更多MCS表现可诊断96%的MCS患者。MCS患者更可能在6个月龄前就诊(66%对32%)。

结论

MCS患者比MR患者就诊更早。体格检查时,外侧额骨与外侧眼眶的关系对区分这两种诊断很重要。CT扫描有助于诊断,并非用于确认缝线闭合,而是识别3个或更多MCS特征。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验