Do as you would be done by: write as you would wish to read.
作者信息
Drummond Gordon B, Vowler Sarah L
出版信息
Exp Physiol. 2013 Feb;98(2):355-8. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2012.071035.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Do as you would be done by: write as you would wish to read.己所不欲，勿施于人；所欲而书，予人可读。
Exp Physiol. 2013 Feb;98(2):355-8. doi: 10.1113/expphysiol.2012.071035.
2
Do as you would be done by: write as you would wish to read.己所不欲，勿施于人；所欲而书，即为读者之愿。
J Physiol. 2012 Dec 15;590(24):6251-4. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.248278.
3
Twenty statistical errors even you can find in biomedical research articles.生物医学研究文章中你也能发现的20个统计错误。
Croat Med J. 2004 Aug;45(4):361-70.
4
Do as you would be done by: write as you would wish to read.
Adv Physiol Educ. 2013 Mar;37(1):49-52. doi: 10.1152/advan.00151.2012.
5
Documenting the methods history: would it improve the interpretability of studies?记录方法的历史：这会提高研究的可解释性吗？
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2012 Jul 1;5(4):418-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.112.967646.
6
Replicability, Reproducibility, and Fragility of Research Findings-Ultimately, Caveat Emptor.研究结果的可重复性、再现性与脆弱性——最终，买家需谨慎。
Anesth Analg. 2016 Jul;123(1):244-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001398.
7
Cohort studies: marching forward.队列研究：不断前进。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006 Sep;1(5):1117-23. doi: 10.2215/CJN.00080106. Epub 2006 Aug 2.
8
A systematic approach to initial data analysis is good research practice.对初始数据分析采用系统的方法是良好的研究实践。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2016 Jan;151(1):25-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2015.09.085. Epub 2015 Sep 28.
9
What is Wrong With Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: If You Want the Right Answer, Ask the Right Question!系统评价和Meta分析存在哪些问题：若你想得到正确答案，就提出正确问题！
Aesthet Surg J. 2016 Nov;36(10):1198-1201. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw172.
10
Assessment and control of confounding in trauma research.创伤研究中混杂因素的评估与控制
J Trauma Stress. 2007 Oct;20(5):807-20. doi: 10.1002/jts.20298.
Zotero 插件