Ndongo S, Pouye A, Lekpa F K, Bihéhé D M, Tiendrebeogo J, Ndao A C, Ka M M, Moreira Diop T
Clinique Médicale I, CHU Le Dantec, Dakar Etoile, Sénégal.
Med Sante Trop. 2012 Oct-Dec;22(4):385-9. doi: 10.1684/mst.2012.0096.
Few data are available on the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in sub-Saharan Africa, where the diagnosis is often substantially delayed. Disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are more effective when started early. Biotherapies are not available. Given the socioeconomic constraints in sub-Saharan Africa, treatments must be selected based on locally available resources. The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes 6 months after initiation of conventional DMARDs in Senegalese patients with RA.
We retrospectively studied consecutive RA patients seen at the rheumatology outpatient clinic of the Le Dantec Teaching Hospital, Dakar, Senegal, from January 2005 through June 2009. All patients met the ACR criteria for RA. ACR and EULAR response criteria were evaluated 6 months after treatment initiation.
The study included 205 patients. Corticosteroids were used in 205 patients, hydroxychloroquine in 190, methotrexate in 137, and sulfasalazine in 11. Combined corticosteroid, methotrexate, and hydroxychloroquine therapy was used in 122 patients and combined corticosteroid and hydroxychloroquine therapy in 63. DMARD treatment was interrupted for at least 5 days per month for 26% of the patients, either because the drugs were out of stock at the local pharmacies and/or because the patients could not afford to purchase them. During the first 6 months of treatment, patients had a mean of 4 clinic visits, and 48% of patients missed at least one scheduled visit. After 6 months, all clinical variables had improved significantly, except the swollen joint count. The ACR20, 50, and 70 response criteria were met in 50%, 31%, and 6.9% of patients, respectively. The EULAR response was good in 53.9% of patients, moderate in 12.7%, and poor in 23.1%. DMARD therapy failed in 10.3% of patients. Half the patients had their treatment modified during the 6-month study period. DMARD therapy was discontinued in 10 patients for the following reasons: plans to become pregnant, n = 5; pregnancy during treatment, n = 2; and tuberculosis, n = 3.
In Senegal, the treatment of RA relies chiefly on variable combinations of methotrexate, hydroxychloroquine, and corticosteroids. The six-month outcomes are satisfactory. Biotherapy is required in 7% to 10% of patients, a rate that could be decreased by optimizing patient follow-up. The management of chronic inflammatory joint disease couple be improved despite the limited financial resources in sub-Saharan Africa with better physician training and the incorporation of osteoarticular diseases within a vast information and education program for the general population.
关于撒哈拉以南非洲地区类风湿关节炎(RA)的治疗,可获取的数据很少,该地区的诊断往往会大幅延迟。病情改善抗风湿药物(DMARDs)早期使用时效果更佳。生物疗法无法获取。鉴于撒哈拉以南非洲地区的社会经济限制,必须根据当地可得资源选择治疗方法。本研究的目的是评估塞内加尔RA患者开始使用传统DMARDs 6个月后的治疗效果。
我们回顾性研究了2005年1月至2009年6月在塞内加尔达喀尔勒丹泰克教学医院风湿病门诊就诊的连续性RA患者。所有患者均符合RA的美国风湿病学会(ACR)标准。在开始治疗6个月后评估ACR和欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)反应标准。
该研究纳入了205例患者。205例患者使用了皮质类固醇,190例使用了羟氯喹,137例使用了甲氨蝶呤,11例使用了柳氮磺胺吡啶。122例患者使用了皮质类固醇、甲氨蝶呤和羟氯喹联合治疗,63例患者使用了皮质类固醇和羟氯喹联合治疗。26%的患者每月DMARD治疗中断至少5天,原因要么是当地药店药物缺货,要么是患者无力购买。在治疗的前6个月,患者平均就诊4次,48%的患者至少错过一次预定就诊。6个月后,除肿胀关节计数外,所有临床变量均有显著改善。分别有50%、31%和6.9%的患者达到ACR20、50和70反应标准。53.9%的患者EULAR反应良好,12.7%为中度,23.1%为差。10.3%的患者DMARD治疗失败。一半的患者在6个月的研究期间调整了治疗方案。10例患者因以下原因停用DMARD治疗:计划怀孕,5例;治疗期间怀孕,2例;以及结核病,3例。
在塞内加尔,RA的治疗主要依赖于甲氨蝶呤、羟氯喹和皮质类固醇的不同组合。6个月的治疗效果令人满意。7%至10%的患者需要生物疗法,通过优化患者随访,这一比例可能会降低。尽管撒哈拉以南非洲地区财政资源有限,但通过更好的医生培训以及将骨关节疾病纳入针对普通人群的广泛信息和教育项目,慢性炎症性关节疾病的管理可以得到改善。