van Vollenhoven R F, Ernestam S, Geborek P, Petersson I F, Cöster L, Waltbrand E, Zickert A, Theander J, Thörner A, Hellström H, Teleman A, Dackhammar C, Akre F, Forslind K, Ljung L, Oding R, Chatzidionysiou A, Wörnert M, Bratt J
Rheumatology Clinic, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Lancet. 2009 Aug 8;374(9688):459-66. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60944-2.
New treatment strategies for early rheumatoid arthritis are evolving rapidly. We aimed to compare addition of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine) with addition of a tumour necrosis factor antagonist (infliximab) to methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis.
We undertook a randomised trial in 15 rheumatology units in Sweden. We enrolled patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (symptom duration <1 year) and administered methotrexate (up to 20 mg per week). After 3-4 months, those who had not achieved low disease activity but who could tolerate methotrexate were randomly allocated by computer addition of either sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine or infliximab. Primary outcome was achievement of a good response according to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria at 12 months. Patients were followed up to 24 months; here, we present findings at 12 months. Analysis was by intention to treat and we used non-responder imputation. The Swefot (Swedish Pharmacotherapy) study is registered in the WHO database at the Karolinska University Hospital, number CT20080004.
487 patients were initially enrolled. Of 258 who had not achieved low disease activity with methotrexate, 130 were allocated sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine and 128 were assigned infliximab. 32 of 130 (25%) patients allocated sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine achieved the primary outcome compared with 50 of 128 (39%) assigned infliximab (risk ratio 1.59 [95% CI 1.10-2.30], p=0.0160). Adverse events were balanced fairly well between the two groups and accorded with known adverse events of the drugs used. No deaths occurred in either group.
In patients with early rheumatoid arthritis in whom methotrexate treatment failed, addition of a tumour necrosis factor antagonist to methotrexate monotherapy is clinically superior to addition of conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.
Swedish Rheumatism Association, Schering-Plough.
早期类风湿关节炎的新治疗策略正在迅速发展。我们旨在比较在早期类风湿关节炎患者中,在甲氨蝶呤基础上加用传统改善病情抗风湿药(柳氮磺胺吡啶和羟氯喹)与加用肿瘤坏死因子拮抗剂(英夫利昔单抗)的效果。
我们在瑞典的15个风湿病科进行了一项随机试验。纳入早期类风湿关节炎患者(症状持续时间<1年)并给予甲氨蝶呤(每周剂量最高20毫克)。3至4个月后,那些未达到低疾病活动度但能耐受甲氨蝶呤的患者通过计算机随机分配接受柳氮磺胺吡啶和羟氯喹或英夫利昔单抗治疗。主要结局是根据欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)标准在12个月时达到良好反应。对患者随访至24个月;在此,我们展示12个月时的研究结果。分析采用意向性治疗原则,并使用无反应者填补法。Swefot(瑞典药物治疗)研究已在卡罗林斯卡大学医院的WHO数据库中注册,编号为CT20080004。
最初纳入487例患者。在258例使用甲氨蝶呤未达到低疾病活动度的患者中,130例被分配接受柳氮磺胺吡啶和羟氯喹治疗,128例被分配接受英夫利昔单抗治疗。接受柳氮磺胺吡啶和羟氯喹治疗的130例患者中有32例(25%)达到主要结局,而接受英夫利昔单抗治疗的128例患者中有50例(39%)达到主要结局(风险比1.59[95%CI 1.10 - 2.30],p = 0.0160)。两组之间不良事件分布较为均衡,且与所用药物已知的不良事件相符。两组均未发生死亡病例。
在甲氨蝶呤治疗失败的早期类风湿关节炎患者中,在甲氨蝶呤单药治疗基础上加用肿瘤坏死因子拮抗剂在临床上优于加用传统改善病情抗风湿药。
瑞典风湿病协会、先灵葆雅公司。