Suppr超能文献

一项吉西他滨和替吉奥联合治疗与吉西他滨单药治疗晚期胆道癌的随机 II 期研究。

A randomized phase II study of gemcitabine and S-1 combination therapy versus gemcitabine monotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan.

出版信息

Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2013 Apr;71(4):973-9. doi: 10.1007/s00280-013-2090-4. Epub 2013 Jan 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

In order to confirm the impact of adding S-1 to gemcitabine, we conducted a randomized phase II study to compare the combination therapy of gemcitabine plus S-1 to gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer were randomized to either the combination therapy of gemcitabine and S-1 (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 15 and S-1 40 mg/m(2) b.i.d. on days 1-14, repeated every 4 weeks) or gemcitabine monotherapy (gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15, repeated every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint of this study was response rate, and the regimen which showed the better response rate was selected as a candidate of phase III study. Tumor response was assessed every two cycles using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria version 1.0.

RESULTS

The response rates of the combination therapy and the monotherapy were 20.0 and 9.4 %, respectively. The median time-to-progressions and overall survivals of these two treatments were nearly the same (5.6 vs. 4.3 months; 8.9 vs. 9.2 months). Adverse events occurred more frequently in the combination arm.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination therapy of gemcitabine and S-1 showed the better response rate, but the superiority of this combination therapy was not clear in total. Because the standard of care changed to the combination therapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin during this study, it is difficult to select this combination therapy with a 4-week regimen as a candidate of phase III study.

摘要

目的

为了确认添加 S-1 对吉西他滨的影响,我们进行了一项随机的 II 期研究,比较了吉西他滨联合 S-1 与吉西他滨单药治疗晚期胆道癌患者的疗效。

方法

62 例晚期胆管癌或胆囊癌患者被随机分为联合治疗组(吉西他滨 1000mg/m²,第 1 和 15 天,S-1 40mg/m²,每日 2 次,第 1-14 天,每 4 周重复)或吉西他滨单药治疗组(吉西他滨 1000mg/m²,第 1、8 和 15 天,每 4 周重复)。该研究的主要终点是缓解率,缓解率更高的方案被选为 III 期研究的候选方案。每两个周期使用实体瘤反应评价标准 1.0 评估肿瘤反应。

结果

联合治疗组和单药治疗组的缓解率分别为 20.0%和 9.4%。这两种治疗方法的中位无进展生存期和总生存期几乎相同(5.6 个月 vs. 4.3 个月;8.9 个月 vs. 9.2 个月)。联合治疗组不良反应发生更频繁。

结论

吉西他滨联合 S-1 治疗组缓解率较高,但该联合治疗的总体优势不明确。由于在研究期间,吉西他滨联合顺铂的治疗方案成为标准治疗,因此很难选择这种 4 周方案的联合治疗作为 III 期研究的候选方案。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验