• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英格兰旺兹沃思标准化儿童免疫接种呼叫/回叫系统的评估。

The evaluation of a standardized call/recall system for childhood immunizations in Wandsworth, England.

机构信息

Wandsworth Public Health Department, Wandsworth Town Hall, Wandsworth High Street, London, SW18 2PU, UK.

出版信息

J Community Health. 2013 Jun;38(3):581-7. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9654-4.

DOI:10.1007/s10900-013-9654-4
PMID:23355104
Abstract

To improve uptake of childhood immunizations in Wandsworth we developed a standardized call/recall system based on parents being sent three reminders and defaulters being referred to a Health Visitor. Thirty-two out of 44 primary care practices in the area implemented the intervention in September 2011. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation, delivery and impact on immunization uptake of the new call/recall system. To assess implementation and delivery, a mixed method approach was used including qualitative (structured interviews) and quantitative (data collected at three months post-implementation) assessment. To assess the impact, we used Student's t test to compare the difference in immunization uptake rates between intervention and non-intervention practices before and after implementation. The call/recall system was viewed positively by both parents and staff. Most children due or overdue immunizations were successfully captured by the 1st invitation reminder. After three invitations, between 87.3 % (MMR1) and 92.2 % (pre-school booster) of children identified as due or overdue immunizations successfully responded. Prior to implementation there was no difference in uptake rates between intervention and non-intervention practices. Post-implementation uptake rates for DTaP/IPV/Hib, MMR1, MMR2 and the pre-school booster were significantly greater in the intervention practices. Similar findings were seen for PCV and Hib/MenC boosters, although the differences were not statistically significant at the 5 % level. Following the successful implementation of a standardized call/recall system in Wandsworth, other regions or primary care practices may wish to consider introducing a similar system to help improve their immunization coverage levels.

摘要

为了提高旺兹沃思地区儿童疫苗接种率,我们开发了一个基于向家长发送三次提醒、对未接种者转介给健康访视员的标准化呼叫/召回系统。该地区 44 家初级保健机构中有 32 家于 2011 年 9 月实施了该干预措施。本研究旨在评估新的呼叫/召回系统的实施、交付情况及其对免疫接种率的影响。为了评估实施和交付情况,我们采用了混合方法,包括定性(结构化访谈)和定量(实施后三个月收集的数据)评估。为了评估影响,我们使用学生 t 检验比较了实施前后干预和非干预实践中免疫接种率的差异。该呼叫/召回系统得到了家长和工作人员的积极评价。通过第一次邀请提醒,大多数应接种或逾期未接种疫苗的儿童都成功被捕捉到。经过三次邀请,有 87.3%(MMR1)至 92.2%(学前加强针)的应接种或逾期未接种疫苗的儿童成功回应。在实施之前,干预和非干预实践中的接种率没有差异。实施后,DTaP/IPV/Hib、MMR1、MMR2 和学前加强针的接种率在干预实践中显著增加。PCV 和 Hib/MenC 加强针也有类似的发现,尽管在 5%的水平上差异没有统计学意义。在旺兹沃思成功实施标准化呼叫/召回系统后,其他地区或初级保健机构可能希望考虑引入类似的系统,以帮助提高其免疫接种覆盖率。

相似文献

1
The evaluation of a standardized call/recall system for childhood immunizations in Wandsworth, England.英格兰旺兹沃思标准化儿童免疫接种呼叫/回叫系统的评估。
J Community Health. 2013 Jun;38(3):581-7. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9654-4.
2
Reducing geographic, racial, and ethnic disparities in childhood immunization rates by using reminder/recall interventions in urban primary care practices.通过在城市初级保健机构中采用提醒/召回干预措施,减少儿童免疫接种率方面的地理、种族和族裔差异。
Pediatrics. 2002 Nov;110(5):e58. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.5.e58.
3
Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a Haemophilus influenzae type b tetanus conjugate vaccine when administered separately or mixed with concomitant diphtheria-tetanus-toxoid and acellular pertussis vaccine for primary and for booster immunizations.b型流感嗜血杆菌破伤风结合疫苗单独接种或与白喉-破伤风类毒素及无细胞百日咳疫苗混合接种用于初次免疫和加强免疫时的免疫原性和反应原性。
Eur J Pediatr. 1998 Mar;157(3):208-14. doi: 10.1007/s004310050797.
4
Comparison of the tolerability of an acellular pertussis-containing vaccine given as the fifth booster dose in differently primed children.比较不同初免儿童中作为第五次加强剂接种的无细胞百日咳疫苗的耐受性。
Vaccine. 2011 Jun 10;29(26):4373-7. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.04.009. Epub 2011 Apr 22.
5
Non-specific effects of measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) vaccination in high income setting: population based cohort study in the Netherlands.高收入环境下麻疹、腮腺炎和风疹(MMR)疫苗接种的非特异性影响:荷兰基于人群的队列研究
BMJ. 2017 Aug 30;358:j3862. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j3862.
6
Persistence of antibody response following a booster dose of Hib-MenC-TT glycoconjugate vaccine to five years: a follow-up study.加强免疫 Hib-MenC-TT 结合疫苗后抗体反应的持久性:一项随访研究。
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2012 Oct;31(10):1069-73. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e318262528c.
7
New combination vaccines: DTaP-IPV (Kinrix) and DTaP-IPV/Hib (Pentacel).新联合疫苗:DTaP-IPV(金鑫宁)和 DTaP-IPV/Hib(沛儿)。
Ann Pharmacother. 2010 Mar;44(3):515-23. doi: 10.1345/aph.1M468.
8
Impact of maternal diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis vaccination on pertussis booster immune responses in toddlers: Follow-up of a randomized trial.母亲接种白喉-破伤风-无细胞百日咳疫苗对幼儿百日咳加强免疫反应的影响:一项随机试验的随访。
Vaccine. 2021 Mar 12;39(11):1598-1608. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.02.001. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
9
A phase III, open-label, randomised multicentre study to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose of two different reduced antigen diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-polio vaccines, when co-administered with measles-mumps-rubella vaccine in 3 and 4-year-old healthy children in the UK.一项 III 期、开放性标签、随机多中心研究,旨在评估在英国 3 至 4 岁健康儿童中,同时接种麻疹-腮腺炎-风疹疫苗时,两种不同低剂量抗原白喉-破伤风-无细胞百日咳-脊髓灰质炎疫苗加强剂量的免疫原性和安全性。
Vaccine. 2018 Apr 19;36(17):2300-2306. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.03.021. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
10
Simultaneous administration of meningococcal C conjugate vaccine and diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-inactivated poliovirus-Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine in children: a randomized double-blind study.儿童同时接种脑膜炎球菌C结合疫苗和白喉-破伤风-无细胞百日咳-灭活脊髓灰质炎病毒-乙型流感嗜血杆菌结合疫苗:一项随机双盲研究。
Clin Invest Med. 2002 Dec;25(6):243-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Parents' and informal caregivers' experiences of accessing childhood vaccination services within the United Kingdom: a systematic scoping review of empirical evidence.英国父母及非正式照料者获取儿童疫苗接种服务的经历:实证证据的系统综述
BMC Public Health. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):3434. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20981-0.
2
Mobile Phone Text Message Reminders to Improve Vaccination Uptake: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.手机短信提醒以提高疫苗接种率:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Oct 8;12(10):1151. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12101151.
3
Vaccination in England: a review of why business as usual is not enough to maintain coverage.

本文引用的文献

1
Primary care strategies to improve childhood immunisation uptake in developed countries: systematic review.发达国家提高儿童免疫接种率的初级保健策略:系统评价
JRSM Short Rep. 2011 Oct;2(10):81. doi: 10.1258/shorts.2011.011112. Epub 2011 Oct 25.
2
Effect of patient reminder/recall interventions on immunization rates: A review.患者提醒/召回干预措施对免疫接种率的影响:一项综述。
JAMA. 2000 Oct 11;284(14):1820-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.14.1820.
英国的疫苗接种:为什么维持常规接种并不能保持疫苗接种率的原因综述。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 6;18(1):1351. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6228-5.
4
Feasibility of implementing a cellphone-based reminder/recall strategy to improve childhood routine immunization in a low-resource setting: a descriptive report.在资源匮乏地区实施基于手机的提醒/召回策略以改善儿童常规免疫接种的可行性:一份描述性报告。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Dec 4;17(Suppl 2):703. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2639-8.
5
Measuring inequalities in immunization in Wales and the impact of interventions.衡量威尔士免疫接种方面的不平等现象及干预措施的影响。
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2016 Oct 2;12(10):2704-2706. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2016.1217141.
6
Interventions to reduce inequalities in vaccine uptake in children and adolescents aged <19 years: a systematic review.减少19岁以下儿童和青少年疫苗接种不平等现象的干预措施:一项系统综述
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2017 Jan;71(1):87-97. doi: 10.1136/jech-2016-207572. Epub 2016 Aug 17.