Department of Entomology, China Agricultural University, Yuanmingyuan Xilu No. 2, Beijing, 100193, China.
J Econ Entomol. 2012 Dec;105(6):1915-20. doi: 10.1603/ec12190.
The relatively low direct mortality caused by Paranosema locustae (Canning) has limited its application for controlling grasshopper when densities are high, and this study sought to determine if the simultaneous use of this pathogen and the IGR, Flufenoxuron (Cascade) could provide effective control. Nine treatments were tested: 45% Malathion EC at 1500 ml/ha, 5% Cascade at 150 ml/ha, 5% Cascade at 75 ml/ha, 5% Cascade at 37.5 ml/ha, P. locustae at 7.5 x 10(9) spores/ha, combinations of 5% Cascade at 75 ml/ha and P. locustae at 7.5 x 10(9) spores/ha, applied in different rations (1:1, 1:2, 1:3) in the same plot, the untreated control. P. locustae was applied on nonoverlapping plots with the IGR. The different in-plot combinations of P. locustae and Cascade in different ratios provided significantly better overall control of grasshoppers (all species) than the treatment of 5% Cascade of 150 ml/ha after 5d, but combinations were not significantly different from the other concentrations of Cascade after 12 and 31 d. When results were examined separately for specific species of grasshoppers, reduction of Dasyhippus harbipes (Fischer-Waldheim), was higher than that of Myrmeleotettix palpalis (Zubovsky). While combinations showed significant differences in the infection of different grasshopper species at 5 and 12 d posttreatment, no significant differences in rate of infection among the primary species (M. palpalis, D. harbipes, and Oedaleus asiaticus Bei-Bienko) were detected 31 d posttreatment. Our study found that P. locustae by itself could control grasshopper populations at medium densities but the combined application of P. locustae and Cascade at a ratio of 1:2 was more effective against high-density grasshopper populations.
舞毒蛾质型多角体病毒(Canning)导致的死亡率相对较低,限制了其在高密度时控制蝗虫的应用,本研究旨在确定同时使用这种病原体和 IGR(Flufenoxuron,Cascade)是否能提供有效的控制。测试了 9 种处理方法:45%马拉硫磷 EC 1500ml/ha、5% Cascade 150ml/ha、5% Cascade 75ml/ha、5% Cascade 37.5ml/ha、7.5×10(9)spores/ha 的舞毒蛾、5% Cascade 75ml/ha 和 7.5×10(9)spores/ha 的舞毒蛾以不同比例(1:1、1:2、1:3)组合在同一地块中的应用、未处理的对照。舞毒蛾在与 IGR 不重叠的地块中使用。不同比例的舞毒蛾和 Cascade 在同一地块中的组合处理,在 5 天后对蝗虫(所有物种)的整体控制明显优于 5% Cascade 150ml/ha 的处理,但在 12 天和 31 天后,组合处理与其他 Cascade 浓度之间没有显著差异。当分别检查针对特定蝗虫物种的结果时,对于 Dasyhippus harbipes(Fischer-Waldheim)的减少量高于 Myrmeleotettix palpalis(Zubovsky)。虽然组合处理在处理后 5 天和 12 天对不同蝗虫物种的感染率有显著差异,但在处理后 31 天,主要物种(M. palpalis、D. harbipes 和 Oedaleus asiaticus Bei-Bienko)之间的感染率没有显著差异。我们的研究发现,舞毒蛾本身可以控制中等密度的蝗虫种群,但舞毒蛾和 Cascade 以 1:2 的比例联合应用对高密度蝗虫种群更有效。