Suppr超能文献

与单纯骨关节炎对照者相比,2 型糖尿病合并骨关节炎的成年人的骨矿化水平升高,且异质性降低。

Bone mineralization is elevated and less heterogeneous in adults with type 2 diabetes and osteoarthritis compared to controls with osteoarthritis alone.

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, 1280 Main St West, Hamilton ON, Canada L8S 4K1.

出版信息

Bone. 2013 May;54(1):76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2013.01.032. Epub 2013 Jan 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine whether trabecular bone mineralization differed in adults with type 2 diabetes compared to adults without type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

Proximal femur specimens were obtained following a total hip replacement procedure from men and women ≥65 years of age with and without type 2 diabetes. A scanning electron microscope was used for quantitative backscattered electron imaging (qBEI) analysis of trabecular bone samples from the femoral neck. Gray scale images (pixel size=5.6 μm(2)) were uploaded to ImageJ software and gray level (GL) values were converted to calcium concentrations (weight [wt] % calcium [Ca]) using data obtained with energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry. The following bone mineralization density distribution (BMDD) outcomes were collected: the weighted mean bone calcium concentration (CaMEAN), the most frequently occurring bone calcium concentration (CaPEAK) and mineralization heterogeneity (CaWIDTH). Differences between groups were assessed using the Student's t-test for normally distributed data and Mann-Whitney U-test for non-normally distributed data. An alpha value of <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

Thirty-five Caucasian participants were recruited (mean [standard deviation, SD] age, 75.5 [6.5]years): 14 adults with type 2 diabetes (years since type 2 diabetes diagnosis, 13.5 [7.4]years) and 21 adults without type 2 diabetes. In the adults with type 2 diabetes, bone CaMEAN was 4.9% greater (20.36 [0.98]wt.% Ca versus 19.40 [1.07]wt.% Ca, p=0.015) and CaWIDTH was 9.4% lower (median [interquartile range] 3.55 [2.99-4.12]wt.% Ca versus 3.95 [0.71]wt.% Ca, p<0.001) compared to controls. There was no between-group difference in CaPEAK (21.12 [0.97]wt.% Ca for type 2 diabetes versus 20.44 [1.30]wt.% Ca for controls, p=0.121).

CONCLUSION

The combination of elevated mean calcium concentration in bone and lower mineralization heterogeneity in adults with type 2 diabetes may have deleterious effects on the biomechanical properties of bone. These microscopic alterations in bone mineralization, which may be mediated by suppressed bone remodeling, further elucidate higher fracture risk in adults with type 2 diabetes.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定 2 型糖尿病患者与非 2 型糖尿病患者的骨小梁矿化是否存在差异。

方法

从年龄在 65 岁及以上的男性和女性的全髋关节置换术中获得股骨近端标本,这些患者患有或未患有 2 型糖尿病。使用扫描电子显微镜对股骨颈骨小梁样本进行定量背散射电子成像(qBEI)分析。将灰度图像(像素大小=5.6 μm(2))上传到 ImageJ 软件中,并使用能量色散 X 射线光谱法获得的数据将灰度值(GL)转换为钙浓度(wt%钙[Ca])。收集以下骨矿化密度分布(BMDD)结果:加权平均骨钙浓度(CaMEAN)、最常见的骨钙浓度(CaPEAK)和矿化异质性(CaWIDTH)。使用正态分布数据的学生 t 检验和非正态分布数据的曼-惠特尼 U 检验评估组间差异。α 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。

结果

共招募了 35 名白种人参与者(平均[标准差,SD]年龄,75.5[6.5]岁):14 名患有 2 型糖尿病的成年人(2 型糖尿病诊断后的年数,13.5[7.4]年)和 21 名无 2 型糖尿病的成年人。在患有 2 型糖尿病的成年人中,骨 CaMEAN 增加了 4.9%(20.36[0.98]wt.% Ca 与 19.40[1.07]wt.% Ca,p=0.015),CaWIDTH 降低了 9.4%(中位数[四分位间距]3.55[2.99-4.12]wt.% Ca 与 3.95[0.71]wt.% Ca,p<0.001)。与对照组相比,两组间 CaPEAK 无差异(21.12[0.97]wt.% Ca 用于 2 型糖尿病,20.44[1.30]wt.% Ca 用于对照组,p=0.121)。

结论

2 型糖尿病患者骨中平均钙浓度升高和矿化异质性降低的组合可能对骨的生物力学特性产生有害影响。这些骨矿化的微观变化可能是由骨重塑抑制介导的,进一步阐明了 2 型糖尿病患者骨折风险增加的原因。

相似文献

3
Bone matrix mineralization is preserved during early perimenopausal stage in healthy women: a paired biopsy study.
Osteoporos Int. 2016 May;27(5):1795-803. doi: 10.1007/s00198-015-3446-x. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
5
Altered matrix mineralization in a case of a sclerosing osteosarcoma.
Bone. 2013 Apr;53(2):409-13. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.12.043. Epub 2013 Jan 2.

引用本文的文献

5
Increased tissue modulus and hardness in the TallyHO mouse model of early onset type 2 diabetes mellitus.
PLoS One. 2023 Jul 7;18(7):e0287825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287825. eCollection 2023.
8
Diabetoporosis: Role of nitric oxide.
EXCLI J. 2021 Apr 16;20:764-780. doi: 10.17179/excli2021-3541. eCollection 2021.
9
Bone Mineral Is More Heterogeneously Distributed in the Femoral Heads of Osteoporotic and Diabetic Patients: A Pilot Study.
JBMR Plus. 2019 Dec 11;4(2):e10253. doi: 10.1002/jbm4.10253. eCollection 2020 Feb.
10
Effects of Diabetes on Bone Material Properties.
Curr Osteoporos Rep. 2019 Dec;17(6):455-464. doi: 10.1007/s11914-019-00538-6.

本文引用的文献

1
Canadian Diabetes Association 2013 clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada. Introduction.
Can J Diabetes. 2013 Apr;37 Suppl 1:S1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2013.01.009. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
2
Association between bone mineral density and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis of observational studies.
Eur J Epidemiol. 2012 May;27(5):319-32. doi: 10.1007/s10654-012-9674-x. Epub 2012 Mar 27.
3
Effects of mineral content on the fracture properties of equine cortical bone in double-notched beams.
Bone. 2012 Jun;50(6):1275-80. doi: 10.1016/j.bone.2012.02.018. Epub 2012 Feb 25.
4
Mineralization pattern of vertebral bone material following fragility fracture of the spine.
J Orthop Res. 2012 Jul;30(7):1089-94. doi: 10.1002/jor.22026. Epub 2012 Jan 6.
7
Scanning electron microscopy of bone.
Methods Mol Biol. 2012;816:365-400. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-415-5_24.
8
FRAX underestimates fracture risk in patients with diabetes.
J Bone Miner Res. 2012 Feb;27(2):301-8. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.556.
9
Serum levels of bone resorption markers are decreased in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Acta Diabetol. 2013 Feb;50(1):47-52. doi: 10.1007/s00592-011-0347-0. Epub 2011 Nov 1.
10
Delayed bone regeneration and low bone mass in a rat model of insulin-resistant type 2 diabetes mellitus is due to impaired osteoblast function.
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Dec;301(6):E1220-8. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00378.2011. Epub 2011 Sep 6.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验