Suppr超能文献

恶性肿瘤分级方法并非评估间皮瘤恶性程度的可靠方法。

The malignancy grading method is not a reliable assessment of malignancy in mesothelioma.

作者信息

Tierney G, Wilkinson M J, Jones J S

机构信息

Department of Histopathology, University Hospital, Nottingham, U.K.

出版信息

J Pathol. 1990 Mar;160(3):209-11. doi: 10.1002/path.1711600305.

Abstract

The ploidy of a series of pleural lesions--reactive proliferations, malignant mesotheliomas and metastatic tumours--was measured on a Leitz Miamed DNA image analyser using Feulgen-stained slides. The technique successfully recognized all the metastatic tumours as malignant; this corresponds to previous work. However, it was not successful in classifying mesothelial lesions as benign or malignant, resulting in a very high false-negative rate and a moderately high false-positive rate. Mesothelial lesions appear to have a wide range of ploidy values irrespective of their biological behaviour. Thus, for primary mesothelial tumours, the ploidy value cannot be used as a reliable diagnostic index.

摘要

使用Feulgen染色玻片,在Leitz Miamed DNA图像分析仪上测量了一系列胸膜病变——反应性增生、恶性间皮瘤和转移性肿瘤的倍性。该技术成功地将所有转移性肿瘤识别为恶性肿瘤;这与先前的研究结果一致。然而,在将间皮病变分类为良性或恶性方面并不成功,导致假阴性率非常高,假阳性率也适中偏高。无论其生物学行为如何,间皮病变似乎都有广泛的倍性值。因此,对于原发性间皮瘤,倍性值不能用作可靠的诊断指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验