Suppr超能文献

二尖瓣修复术采用多个 MitraClips®:多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图评估。

Mitral valve repair using multiple MitraClips®: a dobutamine stress echocardiography evaluation.

机构信息

Heart Center Rostock, University Hospital Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

出版信息

EuroIntervention. 2013 Apr 22;8(12):1372-8. doi: 10.4244/EIJV8I12A210.

Abstract

AIMS

The haemodynamic effect of mitral valve (MV) repair using multiple MitraClips® (MC) has not been investigated. The aim of the study was to evaluate the stress performance of MV repair with MC.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Twenty consecutive patients (77±7 years, 13 men [65%]) after implantation of >2 MitraClips® were subsequently evaluated with dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). After MC implantation, mean transmitral pressure gradient (TPG) (3.3±0.8 mmHg vs. 4.0±0.6 mmHg; p<0.001) and mitral valve orifice area (2.9±0.3 cm2 vs. 3.9±0.4 cm2; p<0.001) were significantly increased during DSE showing a physiological behaviour effect of the MV. LVEF (41±18% vs. 46±21%; p<0.001) and systolic pulmonary artery pressure (42±11 mmHg vs. 44±12 mmHg; p=0.014) increased significantly. The degree of MR was stable during stress (p=0.68). At linear regression, only baseline peak TPG was related to stress mean TPG (p<0.001; Beta 0.816; 95% CI: 0.368-0.918).

CONCLUSIONS

MV repair using MitraClips® should be performed with the aim of maximal reduction of MR degree. MV repair using MC may not lead to pathological degrees of MV stenosis. Although the TPG is significantly increased during stress, it never reaches pathological levels and is always accompanied by a significant increase in MVOA. The degree of residual MR remains unchanged during maximal pharmacological stress.

摘要

目的

使用多个 MitraClip®(MC)修复二尖瓣(MV)的血流动力学效果尚未得到研究。本研究旨在评估 MC 修复 MV 的压力性能。

方法和结果

连续 20 例(77±7 岁,男性 13 例[65%])在植入>2 个 MitraClip®后,随后用多巴酚丁胺负荷超声心动图(DSE)进行评估。MC 植入后,MV 跨瓣压力梯度(TPG)(3.3±0.8mmHg 比 4.0±0.6mmHg;p<0.001)和 MV 瓣口面积(2.9±0.3cm2 比 3.9±0.4cm2;p<0.001)在 DSE 期间显著增加,显示 MV 的生理行为效果。LVEF(41±18%比 46±21%;p<0.001)和收缩期肺动脉压(42±11mmHg 比 44±12mmHg;p=0.014)显著增加。MR 程度在应激期间保持稳定(p=0.68)。在线性回归中,仅基线峰值 TPG 与应激平均 TPG 相关(p<0.001;Beta 0.816;95%CI:0.368-0.918)。

结论

使用 MitraClip®修复 MV 应旨在最大程度降低 MR 程度。使用 MC 修复 MV 可能不会导致 MV 狭窄的病理性程度。尽管 TPG 在应激期间显著增加,但它从未达到病理性水平,始终伴随着 MV 瓣口面积的显著增加。在最大药理学应激期间,残余 MR 的程度保持不变。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验