Suppr超能文献

诊断评估骨密度测量大小调整技术在有和无低创伤性骨折的儿童中的应用。

Diagnostic evaluation of bone densitometric size adjustment techniques in children with and without low trauma fractures.

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Osteoporos Int. 2013 Jul;24(7):2015-24. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2263-8. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Several established methods are used to size adjust dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) measurements in children. However, there is no consensus as to which method is most diagnostically accurate. All size-adjusted bone mineral density (BMD) values were more diagnostically accurate than non-size-adjusted values. The greatest odds ratio was estimated volumetric BMD for vertebral fracture.

INTRODUCTION

The size dependence of areal bone density (BMDa) complicates the use of DXA in children with abnormal stature. Despite several size adjustment techniques being proposed, there is no consensus as to the most appropriate size adjustment technique for estimating fracture risk in children. The aim of this study was to establish whether size adjustment techniques improve the diagnostic ability of DXA in a cohort of children with chronic diseases.

METHODS

DXA measurements were performed on 450 children, 181 of whom had sustained at least one low trauma fracture. Lumbar spine (L2-L4) and total body less head (TBLH) Z-scores were calculated using different size adjustment techniques, namely BMDa and volumetric BMD for age (bone mineral apparent density (BMAD)); bone mineral content (BMC) and bone area for height; BMC for bone area; BMC for lean mass (adjusted for height); and BMC for bone and body size.

RESULTS

Unadjusted L2-L4 and TBLH BMDa were most sensitive but least specific at distinguishing children with fracture. All size adjustments reduced sensitivity but increased post-test probabilities, from a pre-test probability of 40 % to between 58 and 77 %. The greatest odds ratio for fracture was L2-L4 BMAD for a vertebral fracture and TBLH for lean body mass (LBM) (adjusted for height) for a long bone fracture with diagnostic odds ratios of 9.3 (5.8-14.9) and 6.5 (4.1-10.2), respectively.

CONCLUSION

All size adjustment techniques improved the predictive ability of DXA. The most accurate method for assessing vertebral fracture was BMAD for age. The most accurate method for assessing long bone fracture was TBLH for LBM adjusted for height.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估不同的体型调整技术是否能提高 DXA 在患有慢性疾病的儿童中评估骨折风险的能力。

方法

对 450 名儿童进行 DXA 测量,其中 181 名儿童至少发生过一次低创伤性骨折。使用不同的体型调整技术(即年龄的 BMDa 和体积 BMD(骨矿物质表观密度(BMAD));身高的 BMC 和骨面积;身高的 BMC 调整;瘦体重(按身高调整)的 BMC;以及骨和身体大小的 BMC)计算腰椎(L2-L4)和全身(TBLH)Z 评分。

结果

未经调整的 L2-L4 和 TBLH BMDa 在区分骨折儿童方面最敏感但特异性最低。所有体型调整都降低了敏感性,但增加了后验概率,从 40%的先验概率增加到 58%至 77%之间。椎体骨折的 L2-L4 BMAD 和长骨骨折的 TBLH 用于瘦体重(按身高调整)的比值比最高,分别为 9.3(5.8-14.9)和 6.5(4.1-10.2)。

结论

所有体型调整技术均提高了 DXA 的预测能力。评估椎体骨折最准确的方法是年龄的 BMAD。评估长骨骨折最准确的方法是 TBLH 用于瘦体重(按身高调整)。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验