Solan H A, Sutija V G, Ficarra A P, Wurst S A
Schnurmacher Institute for Vision Research, State University of New York, State College of Optometry, New York.
Optom Vis Sci. 1990 Feb;67(2):105-10. doi: 10.1097/00006324-199002000-00008.
The role of visual processing in dyslexia continues to stir controversy. Previous research using early components of visual evoked potentials (VEP's) has revealed differences in visual processing between dyslexics and controls. VEP's have successfully indexed binocular advantage. Intrasensory functioning could conceivably be deficient in dyslexics. This study recorded VEP's in response to contrast-reversing checkerboards binocularly and monocularly from dyslexic and control children. The overall monocular and binocular amplitudes of the major positive peaks (P100) were greater for controls than dyslexics; however, contrary to the original hypothesis, the magnitude of binocular advantage was higher for dyslexics than for the control children. Stimulus factors had an effect, but did not interact with reading ability.
视觉加工在阅读障碍中所起的作用一直存在争议。以往利用视觉诱发电位(VEP)早期成分进行的研究揭示了阅读障碍者与对照组在视觉加工方面的差异。VEP已成功地对双眼优势进行了指标化。可以想象,阅读障碍者的感觉内功能可能存在缺陷。本研究对阅读障碍儿童和对照儿童双眼及单眼观看对比度反转棋盘格时的VEP进行了记录。对照组主要正峰(P100)的总体单眼和双眼振幅大于阅读障碍者;然而,与最初的假设相反,阅读障碍者的双眼优势程度高于对照儿童。刺激因素有影响,但与阅读能力没有相互作用。