• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

高尔夫推杆的分类:不同的高尔夫推杆技术是否存在?

Taxonomy of golf putting: do different golf putting techniques exist?

机构信息

Institute of Sport, Exercise and Active Living, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2013;31(10):1038-44. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2012.762599. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

DOI:10.1080/02640414.2012.762599
PMID:23362806
Abstract

This study is a preliminary investigation into the use of cluster analysis to determine if different putting techniques existed in a group of club level golfers. Putting at a hole 4 m away, the performances of 34 experienced golfers (age 55.3 ± 17.8 years and handicap 15.3 ± 6.9, range 3-27) were analysed using putter head kinematic and centre of pressure data. Two distinct putting techniques were identified (named as Arm putting and Body putting), this being the first time different putting techniques have been reported in the research literature. These techniques were defined by parameters related solely to movement of the centre of pressure along the line of the putt. Some players (17 of 34) moved between techniques when performing their putting trials. Neither technique produced more accurate putt results (P = 0.783). Putting technique was further analysed after grouping players according to handicap (similar skill level) or accuracy (similar putting performance). The lack of significant findings when players were re-analysed according to handicap or accuracy highlights the importance of the correct methodological approach to detecting technique differences.

摘要

本研究初步探讨了聚类分析在确定一群高尔夫球手是否存在不同推杆技术中的应用。在距离球洞 4 米远的地方进行推杆,对 34 名经验丰富的高尔夫球手(年龄 55.3±17.8 岁,差点 15.3±6.9,范围 3-27)的推杆头运动学和压力中心数据进行了分析。确定了两种不同的推杆技术(分别命名为手臂推杆和身体推杆),这是研究文献中首次报道不同的推杆技术。这些技术仅通过与推杆线沿线的压力中心运动相关的参数来定义。一些球员(34 名球员中的 17 名)在进行推杆试验时在技术之间转换。两种技术都没有产生更准确的推杆结果(P=0.783)。根据差点(相似的技能水平)或准确性(相似的推杆表现)对球员进行分组后,进一步分析了推杆技术。根据差点或准确性对球员重新进行分析时,没有发现显著差异,这突出了采用正确的方法来检测技术差异的重要性。

相似文献

1
Taxonomy of golf putting: do different golf putting techniques exist?高尔夫推杆的分类:不同的高尔夫推杆技术是否存在?
J Sports Sci. 2013;31(10):1038-44. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2012.762599. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
2
Club shaft weight in putting accuracy and perception of swing parameters in golf putting.高尔夫推杆中球杆重量对推杆准确性及挥杆参数感知的影响
Percept Mot Skills. 2007 Aug;105(1):29-38. doi: 10.2466/pms.105.1.29-38.
3
Head-putter coordination patterns in expert and less skilled golfers.专家级和技术稍逊的高尔夫球手的头部与击球动作协调模式。
J Mot Behav. 2008 Jul;40(4):267-72. doi: 10.3200/JMBR.40.4.267-272.
4
The effect of retinal defocus on golf putting.视网膜离焦对高尔夫球推杆的影响。
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2008 Jul;28(4):334-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2008.00575.x.
5
The stroke has only a minor influence on direction consistency in golf putting among elite players.中风对精英高尔夫球手推杆方向一致性的影响很小。
J Sports Sci. 2008 Feb 1;26(3):243-50. doi: 10.1080/02640410701530902.
6
The relationship between skill level and patterns in cardiac and respiratory activity during golf putting.高尔夫推杆过程中心脏和呼吸活动的技能水平与模式之间的关系。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Jun;72(3):276-82. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.01.001. Epub 2009 Jan 13.
7
How to detect the yips in golf.如何检测高尔夫运动中的抽搐症。
Hum Mov Sci. 2013 Dec;32(6):1270-87. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.04.004. Epub 2013 Sep 7.
8
Different centre of pressure patterns within the golf stroke I: Cluster analysis.高尔夫挥杆过程中不同的压力中心模式I:聚类分析
J Sports Sci. 2007 May;25(7):757-70. doi: 10.1080/02640410600874971.
9
Different centre of pressure patterns within the golf stroke II: group-based analysis.高尔夫挥杆过程中不同的压力中心模式II:基于组的分析。
J Sports Sci. 2007 May;25(7):771-9. doi: 10.1080/02640410600875002.
10
Perceived distance during golf putting.高尔夫推杆时的感知距离。
Hum Mov Sci. 2013 Dec;32(6):1226-38. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2013.02.003. Epub 2013 Sep 16.