American Association of Birth Centers, USA.
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2013 Jan-Feb;58(1):3-14. doi: 10.1111/jmwh.12003. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
The safety and effectiveness of birth center care have been demonstrated in previous studies, including the National Birth Center Study and the San Diego Birth Center Study. This study examines outcomes of birth center care in the present maternity care environment.
This was a prospective cohort study of women receiving care in 79 midwifery-led birth centers in 33 US states from 2007 to 2010. Data were entered into the American Association of Birth Centers Uniform Data Set after obtaining informed consent. Analysis was by intention to treat, with descriptive statistics calculated for maternal and neonatal outcomes for all women presenting to birth centers in labor including those requiring transfer to hospital care.
Of 15,574 women who planned and were eligible for birth center birth at the onset of labor, 84% gave birth at the birth center. Four percent were transferred to a hospital prior to birth center admission, and 12% were transferred in labor after admission. Regardless of where they gave birth, 93% of women had a spontaneous vaginal birth, 1% an assisted vaginal birth, and 6% a cesarean birth. Of women giving birth in the birth center, 2.4% required transfer postpartum, whereas 2.6% of newborns were transferred after birth. Most transfers were nonemergent, with 1.9% of mothers or newborns requiring emergent transfer during labor or after birth. There were no maternal deaths. The intrapartum fetal mortality rate for women admitted to the birth center in labor was 0.47/1000. The neonatal mortality rate was 0.40/1000 excluding anomalies.
This study demonstrates the safety of the midwifery-led birth center model of collaborative care as well as continued low obstetric intervention rates, similar to previous studies of birth center care. These findings are particularly remarkable in an era characterized by increases in obstetric intervention and cesarean birth nationwide.
先前的研究已经证实了分娩中心护理的安全性和有效性,其中包括国家分娩中心研究和圣地亚哥分娩中心研究。本研究旨在检验当前产妇护理环境下分娩中心护理的效果。
这是一项前瞻性队列研究,对象为 2007 年至 2010 年间在美国 33 个州的 79 家助产士主导的分娩中心接受护理的妇女。在获得知情同意后,数据被输入美国分娩中心协会统一数据集。分析采用意向治疗,对所有进入分娩中心分娩的产妇和新生儿结局进行描述性统计,包括需要转入医院治疗的产妇。
在 15574 名计划在分娩时于分娩中心分娩且符合条件的妇女中,84%的产妇在分娩中心分娩。4%的产妇在进入分娩中心前被转至医院,12%的产妇在进入分娩中心后转入医院。无论在哪里分娩,93%的产妇均为自然阴道分娩,1%为辅助阴道分娩,6%为剖宫产。在分娩中心分娩的妇女中,2.4%需要在产后转院,而新生儿中有 2.6%在出生后转院。大多数转院是非紧急的,1.9%的产妇或新生儿在分娩或分娩后需要紧急转院。没有产妇死亡。在分娩时进入分娩中心的产妇中,产程中的胎儿死亡率为 0.47/1000。不包括先天异常,新生儿死亡率为 0.40/1000。
本研究表明,助产士主导的分娩中心协作护理模式安全有效,且产科干预率与以往分娩中心护理研究相似,持续保持较低水平。在全国范围内产科干预和剖宫产率增加的时代,这些发现尤为显著。