Bovbjerg Marit L, Cheyney Melissa, Brown Jennifer, Cox Kim J, Leeman Lawrence
Epidemiology Program, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Department of Anthropology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA.
Birth. 2017 Sep;44(3):209-221. doi: 10.1111/birt.12288. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
There is little agreement on who is a good candidate for community (home or birth center) birth in the United States.
Data on n=47 394 midwife-attended, planned community births come from the Midwives Alliance of North America Statistics Project. Logistic regression quantified the independent contribution of 10 risk factors to maternal and neonatal outcomes. Risk factors included: primiparity, advanced maternal age, obesity, gestational diabetes, preeclampsia, postterm pregnancy, twins, breech presentation, history of cesarean and vaginal birth, and history of cesarean without history of vaginal birth. Models controlled additionally for Medicaid, race/ethnicity, and education.
The independent contributions of maternal age and obesity were quite modest, with adjusted odds ratios (AOR) less than 2.0 for all outcomes: hospital transfer, cesarean, perineal trauma, postpartum hemorrhage, low/very-low Apgar, maternal or neonatal hospitalization, NICU admission, and fetal/neonatal death. Breech was strongly associated with morbidity and fetal/neonatal mortality (AOR 8.2, 95% CI, 3.7-18.4). Women with a history of both cesarean and vaginal birth fared better than primiparas across all outcomes; however, women with a history of cesarean but no prior vaginal births had poor outcomes, most notably fetal/neonatal demise (AOR 10.4, 95% CI, 4.8-22.6). Cesarean births were most common in the breech (44.7%), preeclampsia (30.6%), history of cesarean without vaginal birth (22.1%), and primipara (11.0%) groups.
The outcomes of labor after cesarean in women with previous vaginal deliveries indicates that guidelines uniformly prohibiting labor after cesarean should be reconsidered for this subgroup. Breech presentation has the highest rate of adverse outcomes supporting management of vaginal breech labor in a hospital setting.
在美国,对于谁是社区(家庭或分娩中心)分娩的合适人选,人们的意见很少一致。
n = 47394例由助产士接生的计划社区分娩的数据来自北美助产士联盟统计项目。逻辑回归量化了10个风险因素对孕产妇和新生儿结局的独立影响。风险因素包括:初产、高龄产妇、肥胖、妊娠期糖尿病、先兆子痫、过期妊娠、双胞胎、臀位、剖宫产和阴道分娩史,以及有剖宫产史但无阴道分娩史。模型还对医疗补助、种族/族裔和教育程度进行了控制。
产妇年龄和肥胖的独立影响相当小,所有结局(医院转诊、剖宫产、会阴创伤、产后出血、低/极低阿氏评分、孕产妇或新生儿住院、新生儿重症监护病房入院和胎儿/新生儿死亡)的调整优势比(AOR)均小于2.0。臀位与发病率和胎儿/新生儿死亡率密切相关(AOR 8.2,95%可信区间,3.7 - 18.4)。有剖宫产和阴道分娩史的女性在所有结局方面的情况都比初产妇好;然而,有剖宫产史但无既往阴道分娩史的女性结局较差,最明显的是胎儿/新生儿死亡(AOR 10.4,95%可信区间,4.8 - 22.6)。剖宫产在臀位(44.7%)、先兆子痫(30.6%)、有剖宫产史但无阴道分娩史(22.1%)和初产妇(11.0%)组中最为常见。
既往有阴道分娩史的女性剖宫产术后的分娩结局表明,对于这一亚组,应重新考虑统一禁止剖宫产术后分娩的指南。臀位分娩的不良结局发生率最高,这支持在医院环境中对阴道臀位分娩进行管理。