Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ, UK; School of Biological Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, MBC, 97 Lisburn Rd, Belfast, BT9 7BL, UK.
J Anim Ecol. 2013 Jul;82(4):846-53. doi: 10.1111/1365-2656.12047. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
Recent work shows that organisms possess two strategies of immune response: personal immunity, which defends an individual, and social immunity, which protects other individuals, such as kin. However, it is unclear how individuals divide their limited resources between protecting themselves and protecting others. Here, with experiments on female burying beetles, we challenged the personal immune system and measured subsequent investment in social immunity (antibacterial activity of the anal exudates). Our results show that increased investment in one aspect of personal immunity (wound repair) causes a temporary decrease in one aspect of the social immune response. Our experiments further show that by balancing investment in personal and social immunity in this way during one breeding attempt, females are able to defend their subsequent lifetime reproductive success. We discuss the nature of the physiological trade-off between personal and social immunity in species that differ in the degree of eusociality and coloniality, and suggest that it may also vary within species in relation to age and partner contributions to social immunity.
最近的研究表明,生物拥有两种免疫反应策略:个体免疫,保护个体;社会免疫,保护其他个体,如亲属。然而,目前尚不清楚个体如何在保护自己和保护他人之间分配有限的资源。在这里,我们通过对雌性埋葬虫的实验,挑战了个体的免疫系统,并测量了随后对社会免疫(肛部分泌物的抗菌活性)的投资。我们的结果表明,个体免疫(伤口修复)的一个方面的投资增加会导致社会免疫反应的一个方面暂时下降。我们的实验进一步表明,通过在一次繁殖尝试中以这种方式平衡个体和社会免疫的投资,雌性能够保护它们随后的终生繁殖成功。我们讨论了在社会群居性和殖民地化程度不同的物种中,个体和社会免疫之间的生理权衡的性质,并提出它也可能与个体的年龄和伴侣对社会免疫的贡献有关而有所不同。