• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非营利性医院与非资助慈善医疗研究特别工作组报告

Report of the Special Task Force to Study Not-for-Profit Hospitals and Unsponsored Charity Care.

作者信息

Anderson R J, Milburn L T

机构信息

Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, TX 75235.

出版信息

Tex Med. 1990 Apr;86(4):68-71.

PMID:2336640
Abstract

Texas not-for-profit hospitals recently received intense scrutiny regarding their involvement in charity-related contributions when Texas Attorney General Jim Mattox formed the Task Force to Study Not-for-Profit Hospitals and Unsponsored Charity Care. This article details the task force's recommendations concerning charity care obligations of Texas not-for-profit hospitals. Setting the stage for these recommendations was a broad definition of charitable services that included costs for delivering services to indigents and for providing community services to fulfill the hospital's charitable, religious, educational, research, or eleemosynary purposes. The task force unanimously agreed that a mandated level of charity care was incongruent with the hospitals' individual missions and specific community needs, but they supported the formation of standard accounting procedures for charitable services and the voluntary submission of their mission statements to the attorney general of Texas. While the hospitals' role in providing charitable services is very important, the task force emphasized that the overall need for adequate financing and reimbursement of health care is a societal problem that needs specific state and federal actions.

摘要

当得克萨斯州总检察长吉姆·马托克斯组建非营利性医院与无赞助慈善护理研究特别工作组时,得克萨斯州的非营利性医院最近因参与慈善相关捐赠而受到严格审查。本文详细介绍了该特别工作组关于得克萨斯州非营利性医院慈善护理义务的建议。为这些建议奠定基础的是对慈善服务的广泛定义,其中包括为贫困人口提供服务的成本以及为实现医院的慈善、宗教、教育、研究或慈善目的而提供社区服务的成本。特别工作组一致认为,规定的慈善护理水平与医院的各自使命和特定社区需求不一致,但他们支持制定慈善服务的标准会计程序,并支持将其使命声明自愿提交给得克萨斯州总检察长。虽然医院在提供慈善服务方面的作用非常重要,但特别工作组强调,医疗保健充足融资和报销的总体需求是一个需要州和联邦采取具体行动的社会问题。

相似文献

1
Report of the Special Task Force to Study Not-for-Profit Hospitals and Unsponsored Charity Care.非营利性医院与非资助慈善医疗研究特别工作组报告
Tex Med. 1990 Apr;86(4):68-71.
2
A systematic method of accountability. Sound policies allow facilities to account for the level of charity care they provide.一种系统的问责方法。合理的政策使医疗机构能够对其所提供的慈善医疗水平负责。
Health Prog. 1992 Nov;73(9):46-51, 57.
3
Community benefit prevails. Are radical changes in hospital tax-exemption laws necessary?社区利益至上。医院免税法律有必要进行彻底变革吗?
Health Prog. 1992 Jan-Feb;73(1):42-7.
4
Texas sues Methodist over charity care.德克萨斯州就慈善医疗起诉卫理公会医院。
Mod Healthc. 1990 Dec 3;20(48):3.
5
Revise or preserve? A flurry of views on revision of tax-exemption standards.修订还是保留?关于修订免税标准的一系列观点。
Health Prog. 1992 Jan-Feb;73(1):38-41, 64.
6
Charity care and the law: case is far from closed.慈善医疗与法律:此案远未了结。
Mod Healthc. 1993 Mar 8;23(10):26-8.
7
Hospitals under attack.医院遭受攻击。
J Med Pract Manage. 2005 Sep-Oct;21(2):103-7.
8
Houston's Methodist Hospital given charity-care ultimatum.
Mod Healthc. 1990 Jul 16;20(28):6.
9
Property tax exemptions: headed for extinction?财产税豁免:走向消亡?
Health Prog. 1988 Dec;69(11):32-6.
10
Promoting accountability: hospital charity care in California, Washington state, and Texas.促进问责制:加利福尼亚州、华盛顿州和得克萨斯州的医院慈善医疗
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2004 May;15(2):237-50. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2004.0030.