Patterson R, Fox R
Department of Psychology, Montana State University, Bozeman 59717.
Vision Res. 1990;30(3):439-48. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(90)90085-y.
This study investigated the functional equivalence between cyclopean (global stereoscopic) and luminance (local stereoscopic) stimuli. To do so, a metacontrast masking paradigm was employed to determine the level of perceptual interaction between the two stimulus domains. Four target and mask combinations were used: cyclopean target-cyclopean mask, luminance target-luminance mask, cyclopean target-luminance mask, and luminance target-cyclopean mask. Substantial intradomain masking occurred, with the form of masking being similar for both domains. Moreover, significant interdomain masking also occurred, in equal measure for the cyclopean and luminance stimuli, although the magnitude of masking was one-half that of intradomain masking. These results imply that there is a functional equivalence at some stage of the visual system between the mechanisms representing cyclopean and luminance stimuli.
本研究调查了双眼单视(整体立体视觉)和亮度(局部立体视觉)刺激之间的功能等效性。为此,采用了元对比掩蔽范式来确定两个刺激域之间的感知相互作用水平。使用了四种目标和掩蔽组合:双眼单视目标-双眼单视掩蔽、亮度目标-亮度掩蔽、双眼单视目标-亮度掩蔽和亮度目标-双眼单视掩蔽。发生了大量的域内掩蔽,两个域的掩蔽形式相似。此外,也发生了显著的域间掩蔽,双眼单视和亮度刺激的掩蔽程度相同,尽管掩蔽幅度是域内掩蔽的一半。这些结果表明,在视觉系统的某个阶段,代表双眼单视和亮度刺激的机制之间存在功能等效性。