Department of Oncology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2013 Apr;19(4):602-6. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2013.01.006. Epub 2013 Jan 29.
The role of allogeneic blood or marrow transplantation (alloBMT) for peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) remains to be defined. There is growing interest in reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) regimens and/or utilization of human leukocyte antigen haploidentical (haplo) grafts given concerns about treatment-associated toxicities and donor availability. We reviewed the outcomes of 44 consecutive, related donor alloBMTs for PTCL performed at Johns Hopkins Hospital from 1994 to 2011, including 18 RIC/haplo alloBMTs. Patients receiving RIC (n = 24) were older, with median age of 59 years (range, 24 to 70), than patients receiving myeloablative conditioning (MAC, n = 20), with median age of 46 years (range, 18 to 64), P = .01. The median age at RIC/haplo alloBMT was 60 years. The estimated 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 40% (95% confidence interval [CI], 26% to 55%) and overall survival (OS) was 43% (95% CI, 28% to 59%). In older patients (≥60, n = 14), the estimated 2-year PFS and OS were 38% (95% CI, 18% to 79%) and 45% (95% CI, 24% to 86%), respectively. On unadjusted analysis, there was a tendency toward superior outcomes for alloBMT in first remission versus beyond first remission, with an estimated 2-year PFS of 53% (95% CI, 33% to 77%) versus 29% (95% CI, 9% to 45%), P = .08. On competing risk analysis, the 1-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 38% for MAC/HLA-identical alloBMTs and 34% for RIC/haplo alloBMTs. Estimated 1-year nonrelapse mortality was 10% for MAC and 8% for RIC (11% for RIC/haplo alloBMT). On unadjusted landmark analysis, patients with acute grade II-IV or chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) had a 17% probability of relapse (95% CI, 0% to 39%), compared with 66% (95% CI, 48% to 84%) in patients without GVHD, P = .04. Utilization of RIC and alternative donors expands treatment options in PTCL to those who are older and unable to tolerate high-dose conditioning, with outcomes comparable with approaches using myeloablative regimens and HLA-matched donors. AlloBMT may be appropriate in first remission in select high-risk cases.
同种异体血液或骨髓移植(alloBMT)在周围 T 细胞淋巴瘤(PTCL)中的作用仍有待确定。由于担心与治疗相关的毒性和供体可用性,人们对低强度预处理(RIC)方案和/或利用人类白细胞抗原单倍体(haplo)移植物越来越感兴趣。我们回顾了约翰霍普金斯医院 1994 年至 2011 年间连续进行的 44 例相关供体 alloBMT 治疗 PTCL 的结果,其中包括 18 例 RIC/haplo alloBMT。接受 RIC(n=24)的患者年龄较大,中位年龄为 59 岁(范围为 24 至 70 岁),而接受骨髓清除性预处理(MAC,n=20)的患者中位年龄为 46 岁(范围为 18 至 64 岁),P=0.01。RIC/haplo alloBMT 的中位年龄为 60 岁。估计 2 年无进展生存率(PFS)为 40%(95%置信区间[CI],26%至 55%),总生存率(OS)为 43%(95%CI,28%至 59%)。在年龄较大的患者(≥60 岁,n=14)中,估计 2 年 PFS 和 OS 分别为 38%(95%CI,18%至 79%)和 45%(95%CI,24%至 86%)。在未调整的分析中,alloBMT 在缓解期优于缓解期以外,估计 2 年 PFS 为 53%(95%CI,33%至 77%),而缓解期以外为 29%(95%CI,9%至 45%),P=0.08。在竞争风险分析中,MAC/HLA 匹配 alloBMT 的 1 年累积复发率为 38%,RIC/haplo alloBMT 的累积复发率为 34%。MAC 的估计 1 年非复发死亡率为 10%,RIC 为 8%(RIC/haplo alloBMT 为 11%)。在未调整的里程碑分析中,有急性 2-4 级或慢性移植物抗宿主病(GVHD)的患者复发概率为 17%(95%CI,0%至 39%),而无 GVHD 的患者复发概率为 66%(95%CI,48%至 84%),P=0.04。RIC 和替代供体的使用扩展了 PTCL 患者的治疗选择,包括年龄较大且无法耐受大剂量预处理的患者,其结果与使用骨髓清除性方案和 HLA 匹配供体的方案相当。alloBMT 可能适用于某些高危病例的缓解期。