Sociedade Brasileira de Cardiologia, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil.
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2013 Jan;100(1):6-13. doi: 10.1590/s0066-782x2013000100003.
There are few registries documenting clinical practice in Brazilian patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Demography description, occurrence of major clinical adverse events and comparative analysis in patients submitted or not to an invasive strategy (coronary angiography and myocardial revascularization) in a Brazilian multicenter registry of acute coronary syndrome.
The ACCEPT/SBC registry prospectively collected data on acute coronary syndrome patients from 47 Brazilian hospitals. The current analysis reports the occurrence of major clinical outcomes and according to the performance or not of a procedure for myocardial revascularization at the end of 30 day follow-up.
Between August 2010 and December 2011, 2.485 patients were enrolled in this registry. Of these, 31.6% had unstable angina, 34.9% and 33.4% had acute coronary syndrome without and with ST-segment elevation. At 30 days, the performance of a myocardial revascularization procedure was progressively higher according to the severity of clinical presentation (38.7% vs. 53.6% vs. 77.7%, p < 0.001). Cardiac mortality among those submitted or not to myocardial revascularization procedure was 1.0% vs. 2.3% (p = 0.268), 1.9% vs. 4.2% (p = 0.070) and 2.0% vs. 8.1% (p < 0.001), in those with unstable angina, acute coronary syndrome without and with ST-segment elevation, respectively.
The prescription of a myocardial revascularization procedure was progressively more frequent according to the severity of clinical presentation; for those treated during acute coronary syndrome without and with ST-segment elevation, there was a trend and significant decrease in mortality rate at 30 day of follow-up, respectively.
巴西急性冠状动脉综合征患者的临床实践情况鲜有记录在案的注册研究。
本研究旨在描述巴西急性冠状动脉综合征患者的人口统计学特征,以及在接受或未接受侵入性策略(冠状动脉造影和血运重建术)的患者中,主要临床不良事件的发生情况和对比分析。
接受冠状动脉造影术和血运重建术的患者数量 ACCEPT/SBC 注册研究前瞻性地从巴西 47 家医院收集急性冠状动脉综合征患者的数据。本分析报告了主要临床结局的发生情况,并根据 30 天随访结束时是否进行血运重建术进行了比较。
2010 年 8 月至 2011 年 12 月期间,该注册研究共纳入 2485 例患者。其中,31.6%的患者为不稳定型心绞痛,34.9%和 33.4%的患者为非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征和 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征。30 天时,根据临床严重程度,进行血运重建术的比例逐渐升高(38.7% vs. 53.6% vs. 77.7%,p < 0.001)。在接受和未接受血运重建术的患者中,心源性死亡率分别为 1.0% vs. 2.3%(p = 0.268)、1.9% vs. 4.2%(p = 0.070)和 2.0% vs. 8.1%(p < 0.001),分别为不稳定型心绞痛、非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征和 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者。
根据临床严重程度,血运重建术的应用逐渐增多;对于急性冠状动脉综合征无 ST 段抬高和 ST 段抬高的患者,分别呈下降趋势,30 天随访死亡率显著降低。