Division of Cardiology, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Cardiol. 2010 Apr 15;105(8):1083-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.12.005. Epub 2010 Feb 20.
Cerebrovascular (CVD) disease is commonly associated with coronary artery disease and adversely affects outcome. The goal of the present study was to examine the temporal management patterns and outcomes in relation to previous CVD in a contemporary "real-world" spectrum of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). From 1999 to 2008, 14,070 patients with non-ST-segment elevation ACS were recruited into the Canadian Acute Coronary Syndrome I (ACS I), ACS II, Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE/GRACE(2)), and Canadian Registry of Acute Coronary Events (CANRACE) prospective multicenter registries. We stratified the study patients according to a history of CVD and compared their treatment and outcomes. Patients with a history of CVD were older, more likely to have pre-existing coronary artery disease, elevated creatinine, higher Killip class, and ST-segment deviation on admission. Despite presenting with greater GRACE risk scores (137 vs 117, p <0.001), patients with previous CVD were less likely to receive evidence-based antiplatelet and antithrombin therapies during the initial 24 hours of hospital admission. They were also less likely to undergo in-hospital coronary angiography and revascularization. These disparities in medical and invasive management were preserved temporally across all 4 registries. Patients with concomitant CVD had worse in-hospital outcomes. Previous CVD remained an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.92, p = 0.019) after adjusting for other powerful prognosticators in the GRACE risk score. However, it was independently associated with a lower use of in-hospital coronary angiography (adjusted odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval 0.60 to 0.83, p <0.001). Underestimation of patient risk was the most common reason for not pursuing an invasive strategy. Revascularization was independently associated with lower 1-year mortality (adjusted odds ratio 0.48, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.71, p <0.001), irrespective of a history of CVD. In conclusion, for patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation-ACS, a history of CVD was independently associated with worse outcomes, which might have been, in part, because of the underuse of evidence-based medical and invasive therapies.
脑血管疾病(CVD)通常与冠状动脉疾病相关,并对预后产生不利影响。本研究的目的是在急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)的当代“真实世界”范围内,检查与既往 CVD 相关的时间管理模式和结局。1999 年至 2008 年,14070 例非 ST 段抬高型 ACS 患者被纳入加拿大急性冠状动脉综合征 I(ACS I)、ACS II、全球急性冠状动脉事件注册(GRACE/GRACE(2))和加拿大急性冠状动脉事件注册(CANRACE)前瞻性多中心注册。我们根据 CVD 史对研究患者进行分层,并比较了他们的治疗和结局。有 CVD 史的患者年龄较大,更可能存在先前存在的冠状动脉疾病、肌酐升高、更高的 Killip 分级和入院时 ST 段偏移。尽管 GRACE 风险评分较高(137 比 117,p <0.001),但既往 CVD 患者在入院后 24 小时内接受基于证据的抗血小板和抗凝治疗的可能性较低。他们也不太可能进行院内冠状动脉造影和血运重建。这 4 个登记处的所有时间都保持了医疗和介入管理方面的差异。同时患有 CVD 的患者住院期间结局更差。既往 CVD 仍然是住院死亡率的独立预测因素(调整后比值比 1.43,95%置信区间 1.06 至 1.92,p = 0.019),在调整了 GRACE 风险评分中的其他强大预后因素后。然而,它与院内冠状动脉造影的使用减少独立相关(调整后比值比 0.70,95%置信区间 0.60 至 0.83,p <0.001)。低估患者风险是不采用介入策略的最常见原因。血运重建与 1 年死亡率降低独立相关(调整后比值比 0.48,95%置信区间 0.33 至 0.71,p <0.001),无论是否存在 CVD 病史。总之,对于非 ST 段抬高型 ACS 患者,CVD 史与较差的结局独立相关,部分原因可能是缺乏基于证据的医疗和介入治疗。