Institute of Neurobiology, Bulgarian Academy of Science, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Exp Brain Res. 2013 Apr;226(1):63-71. doi: 10.1007/s00221-013-3411-x. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
Eye as well as hand movements can adapt to double-step target displacements, but it is still controversial whether both motor systems use common or distinct adaptive mechanisms. Here, we posit that analyses of the concurrent adaptation of both motor systems to equal versus different double-steps may provide more conclusive evidence than previous work about the transfer of adaptation from one motor system to the other. Forty subjects adapted to double-steps which called for a change of response direction. The same (group S) or the opposite change (group O) was required for eyes and hand. Group ON equaled O, except that no visual feedback of the hand was provided. Groups E and H served as controls for eyes-only and hand-only adaptation, respectively. We found no differences between groups or motor systems when comparing S, E and H. Adaptation was faster in O than in S, E and H, and faster still in ON. However, the magnitude of eye adaptation was much smaller in O and ON than in S, E and H. We conclude that concurrent adaptation of eye and hand directions to opposite double-steps attenuates recalibration which, at least for the hand, is largely replaced by workaround strategies. The mechanisms for eye and hand adaptation therefore seem to be coupled, in a way that hinders divergent recalibration of both motor systems. The possible neuronal substrate for our findings is discussed.
眼睛和手部运动都可以适应双步目标位移,但对于这两个运动系统是否使用共同或不同的适应机制仍存在争议。在这里,我们假设分析两个运动系统同时适应相等和不同的双步,可以提供比以前的工作更确凿的证据,证明一个运动系统的适应可以转移到另一个运动系统。40 名受试者适应了需要改变反应方向的双步。眼睛和手需要相同(组 S)或相反(组 O)的变化。组 ON 等于 O,只是对手的视觉反馈没有提供。组 E 和 H 分别作为眼睛和手单独适应的对照组。当比较 S、E 和 H 时,我们在组之间或运动系统之间没有发现差异。O 组的适应速度比 S、E 和 H 组快,ON 组的适应速度更快。然而,O 和 ON 组的眼睛适应幅度远小于 S、E 和 H 组。我们得出的结论是,眼睛和手方向的同时适应相反的双步会减弱重新校准,对于手来说,重新校准在很大程度上被替代策略所取代。因此,眼睛和手适应的机制似乎是耦合的,这阻碍了两个运动系统的发散重新校准。我们的发现的可能的神经元基础进行了讨论。