O'Rielly Jessica L, Ma-Wyatt Anna
School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Hum Mov Sci. 2018 Jun;59:244-257. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.04.013. Epub 2018 May 7.
Goal directed movements are typically accompanied by a saccade to the target location. Online control plays an important part in correction of a reach, especially if the target or goal of the reach moves during the reach. While there are notable changes to visual processing and motor control with healthy ageing, there is limited evidence about how eye-hand coordination during online updating changes with healthy ageing. We sought to quantify differences between older and younger people for eye-hand coordination during online updating. Participants completed a double step reaching task implemented under time pressure. The target perturbation could occur 200, 400 and 600 ms into a reach. We measured eye position and hand position throughout the trials to investigate changes to saccade latency, movement latency, movement time, reach characteristics and eye-hand latency and accuracy. Both groups were able to update their reach in response to a target perturbation that occurred at 200 or 400 ms into the reach. All participants demonstrated incomplete online updating for the 600 ms perturbation time. Saccade latencies, measured from the first target presentation, were generally longer for older participants. Older participants had significantly increased movement times but there was no significant difference between groups for touch accuracy. We speculate that the longer movement times enable the use of new visual information about the target location for online updating towards the end of the movement. Interestingly, older participants also produced a greater proportion of secondary saccades within the target perturbation condition and had generally shorter eye-hand latencies. This is perhaps a compensatory mechanism as there was no significant group effect on final saccade accuracy. Overall, the pattern of results suggests that online control of movements may be qualitatively different in older participants.
目标导向运动通常伴随着向目标位置的扫视。在线控制在纠正伸手动作中起着重要作用,尤其是当伸手的目标在伸手过程中移动时。虽然随着健康衰老,视觉处理和运动控制会有显著变化,但关于在线更新过程中眼手协调如何随健康衰老而变化的证据有限。我们试图量化老年人和年轻人在在线更新过程中眼手协调的差异。参与者在时间压力下完成了一项双步伸手任务。目标扰动可能在伸手动作开始后的200、400和600毫秒出现。我们在整个试验过程中测量了眼睛位置和手部位置,以研究扫视潜伏期、运动潜伏期、运动时间、伸手特征以及眼手潜伏期和准确性的变化。两组都能够根据伸手动作开始后200或400毫秒出现的目标扰动来更新他们的伸手动作。所有参与者在600毫秒的扰动时间下都表现出不完全的在线更新。从第一次目标呈现开始测量的扫视潜伏期,老年参与者通常更长。老年参与者的运动时间显著增加,但两组在触摸准确性方面没有显著差异。我们推测,更长的运动时间使得能够在运动结束时利用关于目标位置的新视觉信息进行在线更新。有趣的是,老年参与者在目标扰动条件下也产生了更大比例的二次扫视,并且眼手潜伏期通常更短。这可能是一种补偿机制,因为在最终扫视准确性方面没有显著的组间效应。总体而言,结果模式表明,老年参与者在运动的在线控制方面可能在质量上有所不同。