Suppr超能文献

一项针对现役军人急性下背痛的整骨手法治疗随机对照试验。

A randomized, controlled trial of osteopathic manipulative treatment for acute low back pain in active duty military personnel.

作者信息

Cruser des Anges, Maurer Douglas, Hensel Kendi, Brown Sarah K, White Kathryn, Stoll Scott T

机构信息

University of North Texas Health Science Center, Texas College of Osteopathic Medicine, Fort Worth, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Man Manip Ther. 2012 Feb;20(1):5-15. doi: 10.1179/2042618611Y.0000000016.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Acute low back pain (ALBP) may limit mobility and impose functional limitations in active duty military personnel. Although some manual therapies have been reported effective for ALBP in military personnel, there have been no published randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) in the military. Furthermore, current military ALBP guidelines do not specifically include OMT.

METHODS

This RCT examined the efficacy of OMT in relieving ALBP and improving functioning in military personnel at Fort Lewis, Washington. Sixty-three male and female soldiers ages 18 to 35 were randomly assigned to a group receiving OMT plus usual care or a group receiving usual care only (UCO).

RESULTS

The primary outcome measures were pain on the quadruple visual analog scale, and functioning on the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Outcomes were measured immediately preceding each of four treatment sessions and at four weeks post-trial. Intention to treat analysis found significantly greater post-trial improvement in 'Pain Now' for OMT compared to UCO (P = 0·026). Furthermore, the OMT group reported less 'Pain Now' and 'Pain Typical' at all visits (P = 0·025 and P = 0·020 respectively). Osteopathic manipulative treatment subjects also tended to achieve a clinically meaningful improvement from baseline on 'Pain at Best' sooner than the UCO subjects. With similar baseline expectations, OMT subjects reported significantly greater satisfaction with treatment and overall self-reported improvement (P<0·01).

CONCLUSION

This study supports the effectiveness of OMT in reducing ALBP pain in active duty military personnel.

摘要

目的

急性腰痛(ALBP)可能会限制现役军人的行动能力并导致功能受限。尽管已有报道称一些手法治疗对军人的急性腰痛有效,但尚未有关于整骨手法治疗(OMT)在军队中应用的随机对照试验(RCT)发表。此外,当前的军队急性腰痛指南并未特别纳入整骨手法治疗。

方法

这项随机对照试验研究了整骨手法治疗在缓解华盛顿州刘易斯堡现役军人急性腰痛及改善其功能方面的疗效。63名年龄在18至35岁之间的男女士兵被随机分为两组,一组接受整骨手法治疗加常规护理,另一组仅接受常规护理(UCO)。

结果

主要结局指标为四分量视觉模拟量表上的疼痛程度,以及罗兰·莫里斯残疾问卷中的功能状况。在四个治疗疗程中的每个疗程之前以及试验后四周测量结局。意向性分析发现,与常规护理组相比,整骨手法治疗组在试验后的“当前疼痛”改善更为显著(P = 0·026)。此外,整骨手法治疗组在所有访视时报告的“当前疼痛”和“典型疼痛”均较少(分别为P = 0·025和P = 0·020)。整骨手法治疗组的受试者在“最佳疼痛”方面也往往比常规护理组受试者更快地从基线水平实现具有临床意义的改善。在基线期望相似的情况下,整骨手法治疗组的受试者对治疗的满意度以及总体自我报告的改善程度显著更高(P<0·01)。

结论

本研究支持整骨手法治疗在减轻现役军人急性腰痛方面的有效性。

相似文献

2
Pregnancy Research on Osteopathic Manipulation Optimizing Treatment Effects: the PROMOTE study.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Jan;212(1):108.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.043. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
3
Recovery From Chronic Low Back Pain After Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2016 Mar;116(3):144-55. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2016.031.

引用本文的文献

1
Current Use and Effects of Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) in the Military: A Scoping Review.
Cureus. 2025 Feb 28;17(2):e79844. doi: 10.7759/cureus.79844. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
Assessment and nonsurgical management of low back pain: a narrative review.
Korean J Intern Med. 2023 Jan;38(1):16-26. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2022.250. Epub 2022 Nov 24.
4
Non-Opioid Perioperative Pain Strategies for the Clinician: A Narrative Review.
Pain Ther. 2020 Jun;9(1):25-39. doi: 10.1007/s40122-019-00146-3. Epub 2020 Jan 13.
5
Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Health of the Surgeon.
Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2019 Nov;32(6):424-434. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1693026. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
6
Osteopathic care for spinal complaints: A systematic literature review.
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 2;13(11):e0206284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206284. eCollection 2018.
7
National Clinical Guidelines for non-surgical treatment of patients with recent onset low back pain or lumbar radiculopathy.
Eur Spine J. 2018 Jan;27(1):60-75. doi: 10.1007/s00586-017-5099-2. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
9
Evidence-Based Evaluation of Complementary Health Approaches for Pain Management in the United States.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Sep;91(9):1292-306. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2016.06.007.
10
Osteopathic manipulative treatment for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2014 Aug 30;15:286. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-286.

本文引用的文献

1
Spinal manipulation or mobilization for radiculopathy: a systematic review.
Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2011 Feb;22(1):105-25. doi: 10.1016/j.pmr.2010.11.002. Epub 2010 Dec 30.
2
A Cochrane review of combined chiropractic interventions for low-back pain.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Feb 1;36(3):230-42. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318202ac73.
5
Back pain during war: an analysis of factors affecting outcome.
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Nov 9;169(20):1916-23. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.380.
7
Why do spinal manipulation techniques take the form they do? Towards a general model of spinal manipulation.
Man Ther. 2010 Jun;15(3):212-9. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2009.03.006. Epub 2009 May 8.
9
Can rate of recovery be predicted in patients with acute low back pain? Development of a clinical prediction rule.
Eur J Pain. 2009 Jan;13(1):51-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2008.03.007. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
10
OSTEOPAThic Health outcomes in chronic low back pain: The OSTEOPATHIC Trial.
Osteopath Med Prim Care. 2008 Apr 25;2:5. doi: 10.1186/1750-4732-2-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验