Suppr超能文献

慢性下腰痛患者接受整骨疗法及整骨手法治疗与未接受该治疗的效果对比:一项基于疼痛登记处的研究

Osteopathic Medical Care With and Without Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Pain Registry-Based Study.

作者信息

Licciardone John C, Gatchel Robert J

出版信息

J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2020 Feb 1;120(2):64-73. doi: 10.7556/jaoa.2020.016.

Abstract

CONTEXT

The OSTEOPATHIC Trial demonstrated substantial improvement in pain intensity, decreased need for rescue medication for pain, and greater likelihood of recovery in patients with chronic low back pain who received 6 osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) sessions over 3 months.

OBJECTIVE

To assess osteopathic medical care and the effectiveness of OMT for chronic low back pain in a real-world setting without the constraints of a rigid research protocol.

METHODS

An observational study of 445 adults with chronic low back pain who had an established osteopathic physician (ie, DO) or allopathic physician (ie, MD) was conducted within the PRECISION Pain Research Registry from April 2016 through February 2019. Primary outcome measures included a numerical rating scale for low back pain intensity, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire for back-related functioning, and use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or opioids for low back pain.

RESULTS

A total of 79, 48, and 318 patients, respectively, were treated by DOs who used OMT, DOs who did not use OMT, or MDs. Patients treated by DOs who used OMT reported significantly lesser low back pain intensity (mean numerical rating score, 5.6; 95% CI, 5.1-6.1 vs 6.1; 95% CI, 5.9-6.3; P=.04) and back-related disability (mean Roland-Morris Disability score, 12.4; 95% CI, 11.1-13.8 vs 14.4; 95% CI, 13.7-15.0; P=.009) than patients treated by MDs. Patients treated by DOs who used OMT also reported less frequent use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (multivariate odds ratio, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.24-0.70; P=.001) or opioids (multivariate odds ratio, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.28-0.98; P=.04). There were no significant differences in primary outcomes between DOs who did not use OMT and MDs.

CONCLUSION

This study of community-based patients in a pain research registry supports the effectiveness of OMT as an integral component of osteopathic medical care for chronic low back pain. Patients treated by DOs who did not use OMT did not experience better results than patients treated by MDs in any primary outcome measure. Further research is needed to more specifically compare the effects of OMT with other treatment effects that may be attributed to patient-DO interactions during medical encounters.

摘要

背景

整骨疗法试验表明,慢性腰痛患者在3个月内接受6次整骨手法治疗(OMT)后,疼痛强度有显著改善,对止痛救援药物的需求减少,康复的可能性更大。

目的

在不受严格研究方案限制的现实环境中,评估整骨疗法医疗服务以及OMT对慢性腰痛的有效性。

方法

2016年4月至2019年2月期间,在精准疼痛研究登记处对445名患有慢性腰痛且已就诊于整骨疗法医生(即DO)或对抗疗法医生(即MD)的成年人进行了一项观察性研究。主要结局指标包括腰痛强度数字评分量表、与背部功能相关的罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷,以及用于治疗腰痛的非甾体抗炎药或阿片类药物的使用情况。

结果

分别有79名、48名和318名患者接受了使用OMT的DO、未使用OMT的DO或MD的治疗。与接受MD治疗的患者相比,接受使用OMT的DO治疗的患者报告的腰痛强度显著更低(平均数字评分得分,5.6;95%置信区间,5.1-6.1对6.1;95%置信区间,5.9-6.3;P = 0.04),且与背部相关的残疾程度更低(平均罗兰-莫里斯残疾评分,12.4;95%置信区间,11.1-13.8对14.4;95%置信区间,13.7-15.0;P = 0.009)。接受使用OMT的DO治疗的患者还报告使用非甾体抗炎药(多变量优势比,0.41;95%置信区间,0.24-0.70;P = 0.001)或阿片类药物(多变量优势比,0.52;95%置信区间,0.28-0.98;P = 0.04)的频率更低。未使用OMT的DO与MD在主要结局方面无显著差异。

结论

这项在疼痛研究登记处对社区患者进行的研究支持OMT作为整骨疗法医疗服务中慢性腰痛综合治疗组成部分的有效性。在任何主要结局指标上,未使用OMT的DO治疗的患者并未比MD治疗的患者取得更好的结果。需要进一步研究,以更具体地比较OMT与其他可能归因于医疗过程中患者与DO互动的治疗效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验