Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54329. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054329. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
Isolated small theropod teeth are abundant in vertebrate microfossil assemblages, and are frequently used in studies of species diversity in ancient ecosystems. However, determining the taxonomic affinities of these teeth is problematic due to an absence of associated diagnostic skeletal material. Species such as Dromaeosaurus albertensis, Richardoestesia gilmorei, and Saurornitholestes langstoni are known from skeletal remains that have been recovered exclusively from the Dinosaur Park Formation (Campanian). It is therefore likely that teeth from different formations widely disparate in age or geographic position are not referable to these species. Tooth taxa without any associated skeletal material, such as Paronychodon lacustris and Richardoestesia isosceles, have also been identified from multiple localities of disparate ages throughout the Late Cretaceous. To address this problem, a dataset of measurements of 1183 small theropod teeth (the most specimen-rich theropod tooth dataset ever constructed) from North America ranging in age from Santonian through Maastrichtian were analyzed using multivariate statistical methods: canonical variate analysis, pairwise discriminant function analysis, and multivariate analysis of variance. The results indicate that teeth referred to the same taxon from different formations are often quantitatively distinct. In contrast, isolated teeth found in time equivalent formations are not quantitatively distinguishable from each other. These results support the hypothesis that small theropod taxa, like other dinosaurs in the Late Cretaceous, tend to be exclusive to discrete host formations. The methods outlined have great potential for future studies of isolated teeth worldwide, and may be the most useful non-destructive technique known of extracting the most data possible from isolated and fragmentary specimens. The ability to accurately assess species diversity and turnover through time based on isolated teeth will help illuminate patterns of evolution and extinction in these groups and potentially others in greater detail than has previously been thought possible without more complete skeletal material.
孤立的小型兽脚类牙齿在脊椎动物微化石组合中非常丰富,并且经常被用于研究古代生态系统中的物种多样性。然而,由于缺乏相关的诊断骨骼材料,这些牙齿的分类学亲缘关系的确定是有问题的。像 Dromaeosaurus albertensis、Richardoestesia gilmorei 和 Saurornitholestes langstoni 这样的物种,其骨骼遗骸仅从恐龙公园组(坎帕阶)中被发现。因此,来自不同地层的牙齿,其年龄或地理位置相差很大,很可能与这些物种无关。像 Paronychodon lacustris 和 Richardoestesia isosceles 这样没有任何相关骨骼材料的牙齿,也从白垩纪晚期不同年代的多个地点被鉴定出来。为了解决这个问题,我们分析了来自北美的 1183 颗小型兽脚类牙齿的测量数据(这是有史以来构建的标本最丰富的兽脚类牙齿数据集),这些牙齿的年龄从桑托阶到马斯特里赫特阶不等,使用了多元统计方法:典范变量分析、成对判别函数分析和多元方差分析。结果表明,来自不同地层的同一分类单元的牙齿通常在数量上是不同的。相比之下,在时间相等的地层中发现的孤立牙齿在数量上彼此无法区分。这些结果支持了这样的假设,即小型兽脚类分类单元,就像白垩纪晚期的其他恐龙一样,往往局限于特定的宿主地层。这些方法在未来对全球孤立牙齿的研究中具有很大的潜力,并且可能是已知的最有用的非破坏性技术,能够从孤立和破碎的标本中提取尽可能多的数据。通过孤立的牙齿准确评估物种多样性和随时间的变化,将有助于更详细地阐明这些群体以及其他群体的进化和灭绝模式,这可能比以前没有更完整的骨骼材料时认为的更详细。