Suppr超能文献

恐龙多样性与岩石记录。

Dinosaur diversity and the rock record.

作者信息

Barrett Paul M, McGowan Alistair J, Page Victoria

机构信息

Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jul 22;276(1667):2667-74. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0352. Epub 2009 Apr 29.

Abstract

Palaeobiodiversity analysis underpins macroevolutionary investigations, allowing identification of mass extinctions and adaptive radiations. However, recent large-scale studies on marine invertebrates indicate that geological factors play a central role in moulding the shape of diversity curves and imply that many features of such curves represent sampling artefacts, rather than genuine evolutionary events. In order to test whether similar biases affect diversity estimates for terrestrial taxa, we compiled genus-richness estimates for three Mesozoic dinosaur clades (Ornithischia, Sauropodomorpha and Theropoda). Linear models of expected genus richness were constructed for each clade, using the number of dinosaur-bearing formations available through time as a proxy for the amount of fossiliferous rock outcrop. Modelled diversity estimates were then compared with observed patterns. Strong statistically robust correlations demonstrate that almost all aspects of ornithischian and theropod diversity curves can be explained by geological megabiases, whereas the sauropodomorph record diverges from modelled predictions and may be a stronger contender for identifying evolutionary signals. In contrast to other recent studies, we identify a marked decline in dinosaur genus richness during the closing stages of the Cretaceous Period, indicating that the clade decreased in diversity for several million years prior to the final extinction of non-avian dinosaurs at the Cretaceous-Palaeocene boundary.

摘要

古生物多样性分析是宏观进化研究的基础,有助于识别大规模灭绝和适应性辐射。然而,最近对海洋无脊椎动物的大规模研究表明,地质因素在塑造多样性曲线的形态方面起着核心作用,并暗示这些曲线的许多特征代表的是采样假象,而非真正的进化事件。为了检验类似的偏差是否会影响陆地分类群的多样性估计,我们汇编了三个中生代恐龙类群(鸟臀目、蜥脚形亚目和兽脚亚目)的属丰富度估计值。利用随时间可得的含恐龙地层数量作为含化石岩石露头量的替代指标,为每个类群构建了预期属丰富度的线性模型。然后将模拟的多样性估计值与观测模式进行比较。强大的统计稳健相关性表明,鸟臀目和兽脚亚目多样性曲线的几乎所有方面都可以用地质大偏差来解释,而蜥脚形亚目的记录与模拟预测不同,可能是识别进化信号的更强有力竞争者。与其他近期研究不同,我们发现白垩纪末期恐龙属丰富度显著下降,这表明在白垩纪 - 古新世边界非鸟恐龙最终灭绝之前的几百万年里,该类群的多样性一直在减少。

相似文献

1
Dinosaur diversity and the rock record.恐龙多样性与岩石记录。
Proc Biol Sci. 2009 Jul 22;276(1667):2667-74. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2009.0352. Epub 2009 Apr 29.
9
The origin and early evolution of dinosaurs.恐龙的起源和早期演化。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2010 Feb;85(1):55-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2009.00094.x. Epub 2009 Nov 6.

引用本文的文献

3
The spatiotemporal distribution of Mesozoic dinosaur diversity.中生代恐龙多样性的时空分布。
Biol Lett. 2024 Dec;20(12):20240443. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0443. Epub 2024 Dec 11.
4
The macroecology of Mesozoic dinosaurs.中生代恐龙的宏观生态学。
Biol Lett. 2024 Nov;20(11):20240392. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2024.0392. Epub 2024 Nov 13.

本文引用的文献

2
Dinosaurs and the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution.恐龙与白垩纪陆地革命
Proc Biol Sci. 2008 Nov 7;275(1650):2483-90. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0715.
4
Palaeoenvironmental controls on the distribution of Cretaceous herbivorous dinosaurs.古环境对白垩纪食草恐龙分布的控制
Naturwissenschaften. 2008 Nov;95(11):1027-32. doi: 10.1007/s00114-008-0417-5. Epub 2008 Jun 26.
6
Estimating the diversity of dinosaurs.估计恐龙的多样性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Sep 12;103(37):13601-5. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0606028103. Epub 2006 Sep 5.
7
Geologic constraints on the macroevolutionary history of marine animals.海洋动物宏观进化历史的地质限制因素。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Aug 30;102(35):12326-31. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0502616102. Epub 2005 Aug 16.
9
Biodiversity: past, present, and future.生物多样性:过去、现在与未来。
J Paleontol. 1997 Jul;71(4):533-9. doi: 10.1017/s0022336000040026.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验