• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

南非 SATVI 结核疫苗试验的监管和伦理审批时间分析。

Analysis of time to regulatory and ethical approval of SATVI TB vaccine trials in South Africa.

机构信息

South African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative (SATVI), Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine (IIDMM), University of Cape Town, South Africa.

出版信息

S Afr Med J. 2012 Nov 8;103(2):85-9. doi: 10.7196/samj.6390.

DOI:10.7196/samj.6390
PMID:23374302
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Tuberculosis (TB) vaccine trials in South Africa must be approved by the Medicines Control Council (MCC) and by a human research ethics committee (HREC). Delays in regulatory and ethical approval may affect operational and budget planning and clinical development of the product.

AIM

Our aim was to analyse the time to regulatory and ethical approval for TB vaccine trials conducted by the South African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative (SATVI) and to evaluate factors that influence time to final approval.

METHOD

Sixteen new TB vaccine clinical trials conducted by SATVI between 2004 and 2012 on infants, children, and adults were included. The period between submission and final approval was determined for protocols submitted to the MCC and the University of Cape Town HREC.

RESULTS

Median approval time following first submission to the MCC was 122 days (IQR 112 - 168; range 71 - 350), and for protocol amendments 103 days (interquartile range (IQR) 76 - 141; range 23 - 191; n=30). Median time following first submission for HREC approval was 60 days (IQR 33 - 81; range 18 - 125), and for amendments 6 days (IQR 4 - 13; range 1 - 37; n=30). There was no significant difference in approval time by trial phase, year of submission, revisions required, study population, sample size, or whether a clinical research organisation (CRO) was used.

CONCLUSION

The time needed for regulatory and ethics approval was highly variable, but MCC approval for first submissions took twice as long as HREC approval and was the primary determinant of time to final approval. National regulatory capacity should be strengthened to facilitate the conduct of new TB vaccine trials in this country with its high burden of TB.

摘要

背景

南非的结核病(TB)疫苗试验必须经过药品管制委员会(MCC)和人类研究伦理委员会(HREC)的批准。监管和伦理批准的延迟可能会影响产品的运营和预算规划以及临床开发。

目的

我们的目的是分析南非结核病疫苗倡议(SATVI)进行的结核病疫苗试验的监管和伦理批准时间,并评估影响最终批准时间的因素。

方法

纳入了 2004 年至 2012 年期间由 SATVI 进行的 16 项新的结核病疫苗临床试验,这些试验涉及婴儿、儿童和成年人。确定了向 MCC 和开普敦大学 HREC 提交的方案的提交到最终批准之间的时间段。

结果

向 MCC 首次提交后的批准时间中位数为 122 天(IQR 112-168;范围 71-350),对于方案修正案为 103 天(IQR 76-141;范围 23-191;n=30)。向 HREC 首次提交后的批准时间中位数为 60 天(IQR 33-81;范围 18-125),对于修正案为 6 天(IQR 4-13;范围 1-37;n=30)。试验阶段、提交年份、所需修订、研究人群、样本量或是否使用临床研究组织(CRO)等因素对批准时间均无显著差异。

结论

监管和伦理批准所需的时间高度可变,但 MCC 对首次提交的批准时间是 HREC 批准时间的两倍,是最终批准时间的主要决定因素。为了在这个结核病负担高的国家开展新的结核病疫苗试验,应加强国家监管能力。

相似文献

1
Analysis of time to regulatory and ethical approval of SATVI TB vaccine trials in South Africa.南非 SATVI 结核疫苗试验的监管和伦理审批时间分析。
S Afr Med J. 2012 Nov 8;103(2):85-9. doi: 10.7196/samj.6390.
2
Convergent ethical issues in HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria vaccine trials in Africa: Report from the WHO/UNAIDS African AIDS Vaccine Programme's Ethics, Law and Human Rights Collaborating Centre consultation, 10-11 February 2009, Durban, South Africa.非洲艾滋病毒/艾滋病、结核病和疟疾疫苗试验中的趋同伦理问题:世界卫生组织/艾滋病规划署非洲艾滋病疫苗方案的伦理、法律和人权合作中心协商会议报告,2009 年 2 月 10 日至 11 日,南非德班。
BMC Med Ethics. 2010 Mar 9;11:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-11-3.
3
Trust and confidence: towards mutual acceptance of ethics committee approval of multicentre studies.信任与信心:迈向对多中心研究伦理委员会批准的相互认可。
Intern Med J. 2004 Nov;34(11):598-603. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2004.00685.x.
4
Novel licensure pathways for expeditious introduction of new tuberculosis vaccines: a discussion of the adaptive licensure concept.新型结核疫苗快速上市许可途径:适应性许可概念探讨。
Tuberculosis (Edinb). 2014 Mar;94(2):178-82. doi: 10.1016/j.tube.2013.11.002. Epub 2013 Dec 8.
5
SATVI - after 10 years closing in on a new and better vaccine to prevent tuberculosis.萨蒂维公司——历经 10 年,成功研发出预防结核病的新型、更好的疫苗。
S Afr Med J. 2012 Mar 2;102(6):438-41. doi: 10.7196/samj.5773.
6
Are adolescents ready for tuberculosis vaccine trials?青少年是否准备好接受结核病疫苗试验?
Vaccine. 2008 Aug 26;26(36):4725-30. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2008.06.088. Epub 2008 Jul 11.
7
Enrolling adolescents in HIV vaccine trials: reflections on legal complexities from South Africa.让青少年参与艾滋病病毒疫苗试验:对南非法律复杂性的思考
BMC Med Ethics. 2007 May 13;8:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-8-5.
8
Engaging adolescents in tuberculosis and clinical trial research through drama.通过戏剧让青少年参与结核病及临床试验研究。
Trials. 2016 Apr 6;17:177. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1291-7.
9
Stakeholder perspectives on ethical challenges in HIV vaccine trials in South Africa.利益相关者对南非艾滋病毒疫苗试验中伦理挑战的看法。
Dev World Bioeth. 2010 Apr;10(1):11-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2009.00254.x.
10
Profile: SATVI--a leading light in tuberculosis vaccine research.简介:南非结核病疫苗倡议组织——结核病疫苗研究的领军者。
Lancet. 2013 Mar 23;381(9871):984. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60698-4. Epub 2013 Mar 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Strengthening ethics committees for health-related research in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review.加强撒哈拉以南非洲与健康相关研究的伦理委员会:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 21;12(11):e062847. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062847.
2
Resource use, costs, and approval times for planning and preparing a randomized clinical trial before and after the implementation of the new Swiss human research legislation.在新的瑞士人类研究法规实施前后,规划和准备随机临床试验的资源利用、成本和审批时间。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 11;14(1):e0210669. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210669. eCollection 2019.