• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

小儿肝移植术后肝动脉并发症的开放手术与血管内介入治疗比较

A comparison of open surgery and endovascular intervention for hepatic artery complications after pediatric liver transplantation.

作者信息

Wakiya T, Sanada Y, Mizuta K, Urahashi T, Ihara Y, Yamada N, Okada N, Egami S, Nakata M, Hakamada K, Yasuda Y

机构信息

Department of Transplant Surgery, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.

出版信息

Transplant Proc. 2013 Jan-Feb;45(1):323-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.08.012.

DOI:10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.08.012
PMID:23375320
Abstract

There are currently 2 major therapeutic options for the treatment of hepatic artery complications: endovascular intervention and open surgery. We herein report a retrospective analysis of 14 pediatric patients with hepatic artery complications after pediatric living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) at our institution. We divided them into an open surgery group and an endovascular intervention group based on their primary treatment, and compared the results and outcomes. We then evaluated which procedure is more effective and less invasive. In the open surgery group, recurrent stenosis or spasm of the hepatic artery occurred in 3 of the 8 patients (37.5%). In the endovascular intervention group, 5 of the 6 patients were technically successfully treated by only endovascular treatment. Of the 5 successfully treated patients, 3 developed recurrent stenosis (60%). There were significant differences in the mean length of the operation for the first treatment of hepatic artery complications (open surgery, 428 minutes vs endovascular intervention, 160 minutes; P = .01) and in the mean value of the posttreatment aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (open surgery > endovascular intervention; P = .04/.05). Although endovascular intervention needs to be examined in further studies to reduce the rate of relapse, it is a less invasive method for the patient and graft than open surgery.

摘要

目前治疗肝动脉并发症有两种主要的治疗选择

血管内介入治疗和开放手术。我们在此报告了对我院14例小儿活体肝移植(LDLT)术后发生肝动脉并发症的儿科患者的回顾性分析。我们根据其主要治疗方法将他们分为开放手术组和血管内介入治疗组,并比较结果和预后。然后我们评估哪种手术更有效且侵入性更小。在开放手术组中,8例患者中有3例(37.5%)发生肝动脉反复狭窄或痉挛。在血管内介入治疗组中,6例患者中有5例仅通过血管内治疗在技术上获得成功治疗。在5例成功治疗的患者中,3例出现反复狭窄(60%)。肝动脉并发症首次治疗的平均手术时长(开放手术为428分钟,血管内介入治疗为160分钟;P = 0.01)以及治疗后谷草转氨酶(AST)/谷丙转氨酶(ALT)的平均值(开放手术组>血管内介入治疗组;P = 0.04/0.05)存在显著差异。尽管血管内介入治疗需要在进一步研究中进行检验以降低复发率,但与开放手术相比,它对患者和移植物的侵入性更小。

相似文献

1
A comparison of open surgery and endovascular intervention for hepatic artery complications after pediatric liver transplantation.小儿肝移植术后肝动脉并发症的开放手术与血管内介入治疗比较
Transplant Proc. 2013 Jan-Feb;45(1):323-9. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.08.012.
2
Endovascular interventions for hepatic artery complications immediately after pediatric liver transplantation.儿童肝移植术后肝动脉并发症的血管内介入治疗。
Transpl Int. 2011 Oct;24(10):984-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01298.x. Epub 2011 Jul 14.
3
Percutaneous endovascular treatment of hepatic artery stenosis in adult and pediatric patients after liver transplantation.经皮腔内血管治疗成人和儿童肝移植后肝动脉狭窄。
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010 Dec;33(6):1111-9. doi: 10.1007/s00270-010-9848-4. Epub 2010 Apr 17.
4
Vascular complications in living-related and deceased donation pediatric liver transplantation: single center's experience from Turkey.亲属活体及尸体供肝小儿肝移植中的血管并发症:来自土耳其单中心的经验
Pediatr Transplant. 2007 Mar;11(2):160-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3046.2006.00601.x.
5
Endovascular Treatment for Very Early Hepatic Artery Stenosis Following Living-Donor Liver Transplantation: Report of Two Cases.活体肝移植术后极早期肝动脉狭窄的血管内治疗:2例报告
Transplant Proc. 2018 Jun;50(5):1457-1460. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2018.02.074. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
6
[Long-term outcomes of hepatic artery stent placement for patients with hepatic artery stenosis after orthotopic liver transplantation].[原位肝移植术后肝动脉狭窄患者肝动脉支架置入的长期疗效]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2008 Aug 12;88(31):2175-8.
7
Repeat endovascular treatment of recurring hepatic artery stenoses in orthotopic liver transplantation.再次行血管内治疗治疗原位肝移植术后复发的肝动脉狭窄。
Transpl Int. 2013 Jun;26(6):608-15. doi: 10.1111/tri.12089. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
8
Single-center experience of therapeutic management of hepatic artery stenosis after orthotopic liver transplantation. Report of 20 cases.原位肝移植术后肝动脉狭窄治疗管理的单中心经验。20例报告。
Eur Surg Res. 2009;42(1):21-7. doi: 10.1159/000166601. Epub 2008 Oct 30.
9
Risk factors and treatments for hepatic arterial complications in pediatric living donor liver transplantation.小儿活体肝移植中肝动脉并发症的危险因素及治疗方法
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Jul;21(7):463-72. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.49. Epub 2013 Oct 20.
10
Management of vascular complications after pediatric liver transplantation.小儿肝移植术后血管并发症的管理
Transplant Proc. 2004 May;36(4):945-6. doi: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.03.104.

引用本文的文献

1
Interventional management of graft hepatic artery dissection in a donor right hepatectomy: a case report.供体右半肝切除术中移植肝动脉夹层的介入治疗:一例报告
Clin Transplant Res. 2025 Jun 30;39(2):169-173. doi: 10.4285/ctr.24.0052. Epub 2025 Mar 14.
2
Incidence, management and outcomes in hepatic artery complications after paediatric liver transplantation: protocol of the retrospective, international, multicentre HEPATIC Registry.肝移植术后肝动脉并发症的发生率、处理和转归:回顾性、国际性、多中心 HEPATIC 注册研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 12;14(6):e081933. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081933.
3
Hepatic arterial and portal venous complications after adult and pediatric living donor liver transplantation, risk factors, management and outcome (A retrospective cohort study).
成人及儿童活体供肝肝移植术后肝动脉和门静脉并发症、危险因素、管理及预后(一项回顾性队列研究)
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2016 Apr 29;8:28-39. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2016.04.021. eCollection 2016 Jun.
4
Interventional radiology in living donor liver transplant.活体肝移植中的介入放射学
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 May 28;20(20):6221-5. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i20.6221.