Makino Elizabeth T, Herndon James H, Sigler Monya L, Gotz Vincent, Garruto John, Mehta Rahul C
SkinMedica Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA.
J Drugs Dermatol. 2012 Dec;11(12):1478-82.
There are numerous common skin disorders involving hyperpigmentation, including solar lentigines, postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, melasma, freckles, and dyschromia from photoaging. While these conditions are of an aesthetic nature, there is great interest in newer, safer, and more effective treatment modalities. Topical hydroquinone (HQ) has been the gold standard of skin lighteners for many years. However, regulatory authorities around the world are now questioning its safety. A randomized, double-blind, half-face study was conducted in females having moderate to severe facial hyperpigmentation to assess the efficacy and tolerability of 3 new skin brightener formulations containing SMA-432, a prostaglandin E2 inhibitor, compared with 4% HQ. Each subject was assigned 2 of the 4 test materials and was instructed to apply the product on the assigned side of the face twice daily for 12 weeks. Evaluation visits were conducted at baseline and at 4, 8, and 12 weeks. At each visit, subjects were evaluated by a blinded investigator for clinical efficacy and tolerability using grading scales. Standardized digital photography and Chroma Meter assessments were also taken. Self-assessment questionnaires were completed at weeks 4, 8, and 12. Sixty-eight Caucasian subjects (136 half faces) completed the study. All test materials significantly reduced overall hyperpigmentation and improved the Investigator's Global Hyperpigmentation Improvement rating at weeks 4, 8, and 12 compared with baseline. SMA-432 exhibited a dose-dependent improvement in hyperpigmentation. There were no major tolerability issues with any of the test materials. Self-assessments were generally favorable for all test materials. At the completion of the trial, subjects rated one of the tested multimodality brightener compositions as the most favorable product and 4% HQ as the least favorable. This study demonstrated that the new non-HQ-containing skin brightener formulations were as effective and equally well tolerated as the gold standard, 4% HQ, in females with facial hyperpigmentation.
有许多常见的涉及色素沉着过度的皮肤疾病,包括日光性雀斑样痣、炎症后色素沉着、黄褐斑、雀斑以及光老化引起的色素异常。虽然这些情况属于美学范畴,但人们对更新、更安全且更有效的治疗方式有着浓厚兴趣。外用氢醌(HQ)多年来一直是皮肤美白剂的金标准。然而,世界各地的监管机构现在对其安全性提出质疑。一项随机、双盲、半脸研究在患有中度至重度面部色素沉着过度的女性中进行,以评估3种含有前列腺素E2抑制剂SMA - 432的新型皮肤美白剂配方与4% HQ相比的疗效和耐受性。每位受试者被分配4种测试材料中的2种,并被指示每天在指定的脸部一侧涂抹产品两次,持续12周。在基线以及第4、8和12周进行评估访视。每次访视时,由一位不知情的研究者使用分级量表对受试者的临床疗效和耐受性进行评估。还进行了标准化数码摄影和色度计评估。在第4、8和12周完成自我评估问卷。68名白种人受试者(136个半脸)完成了该研究。与基线相比,所有测试材料在第4、8和12周时均显著降低了整体色素沉着过度,并提高了研究者的整体色素沉着改善评分。SMA - 432在色素沉着改善方面呈现剂量依赖性。任何一种测试材料都没有重大的耐受性问题。自我评估总体上对所有测试材料都有利。在试验结束时,受试者将其中一种测试的多模式美白剂组合物评为最满意的产品,而将4% HQ评为最不满意的产品。这项研究表明,在患有面部色素沉着过度的女性中,新型不含HQ的皮肤美白剂配方与金标准4% HQ一样有效且耐受性相当。