Christoforidis John B, Wang Jillian, Jiang Angela, Willard James, Pratt Cedric, Abdel-Rasoul Mahmoud, Roy Sashwati, Powell Heather
Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Science, College of Medicine, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2013;7:185-91. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S40537. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
To investigate the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab and ranibizumab on wound tension and by histopathology during cutaneous wound healing in a rabbit model and to compare this effect to placebo intravitreal saline controls 1 and 2 weeks following intravitreal injection.
A total of 120 New Zealand white rabbits were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups each consisting of 40 rabbits. Each group received intravitreal injections of bevacizumab, ranibizumab, or normal saline. Immediately afterwards, each rabbit underwent four 6 mm full-thickness dermatologic punch biopsies. Twenty rabbits from each agent group underwent wound harvesting on day 7 or day 14. The skin samples were stained for CD34 for vascular endothelial cells on day 7, and maximal wound tensile load was measured on days 7 and 14. Quantitative assessment of mean neovascularization (MNV) scores was obtained from 10 contiguous biopsy margin 400× fields of CD34-stained sections by two independent observers.
Wound tension reading means (N) with standard error and adjusted P-values on day 7 were: saline placebos, 7.46 ± 0.87; bevacizumab, 4.50 ± 0.88 (P = 0.041); and ranibizumab, 4.67 ± 0.84 (P = 0.025). On day 14 these were: saline placebos, 7.34 ± 0.55; bevacizumab, 6.05 ± 0.54 (P = 0.18); and ranibizumab 7.99 ± 0.54 (P = 0.40). MNV scores in CD34 stained sections were: saline controls, 18.31 ± 0.43; bevacizumab, 11.02 ± 0.45 (P < 0.0001); and ranibizumab, 13.55 ± 0.43 (P < 0.0001). The interobserver correlation coefficient was 0.928.
At day 7, both anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents had significantly suppressed MNV scores and exerted a significant reduction of cutaneous wound tensile strength compared with saline controls. At day 14, neither agent produced a significant effect on tensile wound strength. Since angiogenesis is an integral component of the proliferative phase of wound healing, we encourage clinicians to be aware of their patients' recent surgical history during intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy and to consider refraining from their use during the perioperative period.
在兔模型中研究玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗和雷珠单抗对皮肤伤口愈合过程中伤口张力及组织病理学的影响,并与玻璃体内注射生理盐水的安慰剂对照组1周和2周后的效果进行比较。
总共120只新西兰白兔被随机分配到三个治疗组之一,每组40只。每组接受玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗、雷珠单抗或生理盐水。之后,每只兔子立即接受4次6毫米全层皮肤打孔活检。每组20只兔子在第7天或第14天进行伤口取材。在第7天对皮肤样本进行CD34染色以检测血管内皮细胞,并在第7天和第14天测量最大伤口拉伸负荷。由两名独立观察者从10个连续的活检边缘400倍视野的CD34染色切片中获得平均新生血管化(MNV)评分的定量评估。
第7天伤口张力读数平均值(N)及标准误和校正P值分别为:生理盐水安慰剂组,7.46±0.87;贝伐单抗组,4.50±0.88(P = 0.041);雷珠单抗组,4.67±0.84(P = 0.025)。第14天这些数值分别为:生理盐水安慰剂组,7.34±0.55;贝伐单抗组,6.05±0.54(P = 0.18);雷珠单抗组,7.99±0.54(P = 0.40)。CD34染色切片中的MNV评分分别为:生理盐水对照组,18.31±0.43;贝伐单抗组,11.02±0.45(P<0.0001);雷珠单抗组,13.55±0.43(P<0.0001)。观察者间相关系数为0.928。
在第7天,两种抗血管内皮生长因子(抗VEGF)药物均显著抑制了MNV评分,与生理盐水对照组相比,皮肤伤口拉伸强度显著降低。在第14天,两种药物对伤口拉伸强度均未产生显著影响。由于血管生成是伤口愈合增殖期的一个重要组成部分,我们鼓励临床医生在玻璃体内抗VEGF治疗期间了解患者近期的手术史,并考虑在围手术期避免使用。