Redcliffe-Caboolture Child and Youth Mental Health Service, Queensland Health Caboolture, QLD, Australia ; School of Psychology, University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Feb 1;7:11. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00011. eCollection 2013.
The present study explored whether semantic and motor systems are functionally interwoven via the use of a dual-task paradigm. According to embodied language accounts that propose an automatic and necessary involvement of the motor system in conceptual processing, concurrent processing of hand-related information should interfere more with hand movements than processing of unrelated body-part (i.e., foot, mouth) information. Across three experiments, 100 right-handed participants performed left- or right-hand tapping movements while repeatedly reading action words related to different body-parts, or different body-part names, in both aloud and silent conditions. Concurrent reading of single words related to specific body-parts, or the same words embedded in sentences differing in syntactic and phonological complexity (to manipulate context-relevant processing), and reading while viewing videos of the actions and body-parts described by the target words (to elicit visuomotor associations) all interfered with right-hand but not left-hand tapping rate. However, this motor interference was not affected differentially by hand-related stimuli. Thus, the results provide no support for proposals that body-part specific resources in cortical motor systems are shared between overt manual movements and meaning-related processing of words related to the hand.
本研究通过使用双重任务范式,探讨了语义系统和运动系统是否存在功能上的交织。根据主张运动系统在概念处理中自动且必要参与的具身语言理论,同时处理与手相关的信息应该比处理与身体其他部位(即脚、嘴)相关的信息对手部运动的干扰更大。在三个实验中,100 名右利手参与者在大声和默读条件下,分别执行左手或右手敲击动作,同时反复阅读与不同身体部位相关的动作词或不同身体部位的名称。同时阅读与特定身体部位相关的单个单词,或阅读在句法和语音复杂性不同的句子中嵌入的相同单词(以操纵与上下文相关的处理),以及边观看目标单词所描述的动作和身体部位的视频边阅读(以引发视动联想),均干扰右手而非左手的敲击速度。然而,这种运动干扰不受手部相关刺激的差异影响。因此,研究结果不支持以下假设,即皮质运动系统中与身体部位相关的特定资源在与手部相关的单词的显性手动运动和与意义相关的处理之间是共享的。