Université de Lyon, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, École Normale Supérieure de Lyon, 69364 Lyon Cedex 07, France.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 19;110(8):E766-75. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210626110. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
TRα1 and TRβ1, the two main thyroid hormone receptors in mammals, are transcription factors that share similar properties. However, their respective functions are very different. This functional divergence might be explained in two ways: it can reflect different expression patterns or result from different intrinsic properties of the receptors. We tested this second hypothesis by comparing the repertoires of 3,3',5-triiodo-L-thyronine (T3)-responsive genes of two neural cell lines, expressing either TRα1 or TRβ1. Using transcriptome analysis, we found that a substantial fraction of the T3 target genes display a marked preference for one of the two receptors. So when placed alone in identical situations, the two receptors have different repertoires of target genes. Chromatin occupancy analysis, performed at a genome-wide scale, revealed that TRα1 and TRβ1 cistromes were also different. However, receptor-selective regulation of T3 target genes did not result from receptor-selective chromatin occupancy of their promoter regions. We conclude that modification of TRα1 and TRβ1 intrinsic properties contributes in a large part to the divergent evolution of the receptors' function, at least during neurodevelopment.
TRα1 和 TRβ1 是哺乳动物中两种主要的甲状腺激素受体,它们是具有相似特性的转录因子。然而,它们各自的功能却大不相同。这种功能上的分歧可以用两种方式来解释:它可能反映了不同的表达模式,或者是由于受体本身的不同内在特性造成的。我们通过比较两种表达 TRα1 或 TRβ1 的神经细胞系中转录因子 3,3',5-三碘甲状腺原氨酸 (T3) 反应基因的谱来验证第二种假说。通过转录组分析,我们发现 T3 靶基因的一个相当大的部分明显偏向于两种受体中的一种。因此,当单独置于相同的环境中时,两种受体的靶基因谱就不同了。在全基因组范围内进行的染色质占有率分析表明,TRα1 和 TRβ1 的顺式作用元件也不同。然而,T3 靶基因的受体选择性调节并不是由其启动子区域的受体选择性染色质占有率引起的。我们的结论是,TRα1 和 TRβ1 内在特性的改变在很大程度上导致了受体功能的分化进化,至少在神经发育过程中是这样。