Seddon Mary E, Jackson Aaron, Cameron Chris, Young Mary L, Escott Linda, Maharaj Ashika, Miller Nigel
Centre for Quality Improvement, Ko Awatea, Counties-Manukau DHB, Private Bag 93 311, Otahuhu, Auckland 1640, New Zealand.
N Z Med J. 2012 Jan 25;126(1368):9-20.
To measure the extent of patient harm caused by medications (rate of Adverse Drug Events) in three DHBs, using a standardised trigger tool method.
Counties Manukau, Capital and Coast and Canterbury DHBs decided to work collaboratively to implement the ADE Trigger Tool (TT). Definitions of ADE were agreed on and triggers refined. A random sample of closed charts (from March 2010 to February 2011) was obtained excluding patients who were admitted for <48 hours, children under the age of 18 and psychiatric admissions. In each DHB trained reviewers scanned these in a structured way to identify any of the 19 triggers. If triggers were identified, a more detailed, though time-limited review of the chart was done to determine whether an ADE had occurred. The severity of patient harm was categorised using the National Coordinating Council for Medication Error Reporting and Prevention Index. No attempt was made to determine preventability of harm and ADEs from acts of omission were excluded.
The ADE TT was applied to 1210 charts and 353 ADE were identified, with an average rate of 28.9/100 admissions and 38/1,000 bed days. 94.5% of the ADE identified were in the lower severity scales with temporary harm, however in 5 patients it was considered that the ADE contributed to their death, 9 required an intervention to sustain life and 4 suffered permanent harm. The most commonly implicated drugs were morphine and other opioids, anticoagulants, antibiotics, Non Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) and diuretics. Patients who suffered an ADE were more likely to be female, older with more complex medical illnesses, and have a longer length of stay.
The rate of medication-related harm identified by the ADE TT is considerably higher than that identified through traditional voluntary reporting mechanisms. The ADE TT provides a standardised measure of harm over time that can be used to determine trends and the effect of medication safety improvement programmes. This study not only shows the problem of medication-related patient harm, but it also shows the utility of informal collaboratives as a mechanism for change.
采用标准化触发工具法,测量三个地区卫生委员会(DHBs)中药物导致的患者伤害程度(药物不良事件发生率)。
马努考郡、首都与海岸以及坎特伯雷地区卫生委员会决定合作实施药物不良事件触发工具(TT)。商定了药物不良事件的定义并完善了触发因素。获取了一份随机抽取的已结案病历样本(2010年3月至2011年2月),排除住院时间不足48小时的患者、18岁以下儿童以及精神科住院患者。在每个地区卫生委员会,经过培训的审核人员以结构化方式浏览这些病历,以识别19种触发因素中的任何一种。如果识别出触发因素,则对病历进行更详细但限时的审查,以确定是否发生了药物不良事件。使用国家药物错误报告和预防协调委员会指数对患者伤害的严重程度进行分类。未尝试确定伤害的可预防性,且排除了因疏忽行为导致的药物不良事件。
药物不良事件触发工具应用于1210份病历,识别出353起药物不良事件,平均发生率为每100例入院患者28.9起,每1000个住院日38起。识别出的药物不良事件中,94.5%属于严重程度较低的暂时伤害等级,但有5名患者被认为药物不良事件导致了他们的死亡,9名患者需要干预以维持生命,4名患者遭受了永久性伤害。最常涉及的药物是吗啡和其他阿片类药物、抗凝剂、抗生素、非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)和利尿剂。发生药物不良事件的患者更可能为女性,年龄较大,患有更复杂的疾病,且住院时间更长。
药物不良事件触发工具识别出的与药物相关的伤害发生率远高于通过传统自愿报告机制识别出的发生率。药物不良事件触发工具提供了一种随时间推移的标准化伤害衡量方法,可用于确定趋势以及药物安全改进计划的效果。本研究不仅揭示了与药物相关的患者伤害问题,还展示了非正式合作作为一种变革机制的效用。